Match type
T20
Teams
Lahore Qalandars vs Peshawar Zalmi
Gender
male
Dates
Feb 28
Sources
Cricingif, CricketArchive, ESPNcricinfo
Status
Mismatch
Number of errors
3

The discrepancies in this match have been identified and can be attributed to the following sources:

  • ESPNcricinfo
  • Cricingif

The video on Cricingif for the first delivery clearly shows Akmal as facing it, confirming that the scorecard on Cricinfo is incorrect regarding the order of the openers in the 1st innings.

The Cricingif scorecard shows the 6th wicket in the 2nd innings as falling when the score was 93, however the video for delivery 9.5 clearly shows the score as 89, which matches what CricketArchive, and Cricinfo say.

Discrepancies

Innings 1

Batters

Batting position 1

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the balls, batter, fours, runs, sixes, and strike rate shown on each scorecard. For balls, ESPNcricinfo shows 15, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive show 9. For batter, ESPNcricinfo shows Tom Banton, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive show Kamran Akmal. For fours, ESPNcricinfo shows 4, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive show 2. For runs, ESPNcricinfo shows 34, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive show 14. For sixes, ESPNcricinfo shows 2, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive show 0. For strike rate, ESPNcricinfo shows 226.67, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive show 155.56; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 this is outside that and thus unacceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Cricingif CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo
Batter Kamran Akmal Kamran Akmal Tom Banton
Runs 14 14 34
Balls 9 9 15
Fours 2 2 4
Sixes 0 0 2
Strike rate 155.56 155.56 226.67
Method of dismissal caught caught caught
Dot balls   3  
Batting position 2

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the balls, batter, fours, runs, sixes, and strike rate shown on each scorecard. For balls, ESPNcricinfo shows 9, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive show 15. For batter, ESPNcricinfo shows Kamran Akmal, Cricingif shows Tom Banton, while CricketArchive shows T Banton. For fours, ESPNcricinfo shows 2, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive show 4. For runs, ESPNcricinfo shows 14, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive show 34. For sixes, ESPNcricinfo shows 0, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive show 2. For strike rate, ESPNcricinfo shows 155.56, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive show 226.67; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 this is outside that and thus unacceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Cricingif CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo
Batter Tom Banton T Banton Kamran Akmal
Runs 34 34 14
Balls 15 15 9
Fours 4 4 2
Sixes 2 2 0
Strike rate 226.67 226.67 155.56
Method of dismissal caught caught caught
Dot balls   5  

Innings 2

Fall of wickets

Fall of wicket 6

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. For runs, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 89, while Cricingif shows 93.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Cricingif CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo
Runs 93 89 89
Wicket 6 6 6
Ball 9.5 9.5 9.5