ID
1173049
Match type
T20
Dates
Feb 22
Teams
Thailand, West Indies
Gender
female
Sources
CricketArchive, ESPNcricinfo, ICC
Status
Mismatch
Number of errors
2
Comparison data
JSON

Discrepancies

Innings 1

Batters

Batting position 10

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 116.66, while CricketArchive lists it as 116.67. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Fours Sixes Dot balls Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 7 6 1 0 2 116.67 stumped
ESPNcricinfo 7 6 1 0   116.66 stumped
ICC 7 6 1 0   116.66 stumped

Bowlers

Bowler position 1

This bowler has an acceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the economy rate as 4.66, while CricketArchive lists it as 4.67. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Wides Noballs Dot balls Fours Sixes Economy rate
CricketArchive 3.0 1 14 1 0 1 11 1 0 4.67
ESPNcricinfo 3.0 1 14 1 0 1 11 1 0 4.66
ICC 3.0 1 14 1           4.66
Bowler position 3

This bowler has an acceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the economy rate as 3.66, while CricketArchive lists it as 3.67. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Wides Noballs Dot balls Fours Sixes Economy rate
CricketArchive 3.0 0 11 1 1 0 8 0 0 3.67
ESPNcricinfo 3.0 0 11 1 1 0 8 0 0 3.66
ICC 3.0 0 11 1           3.66

Innings 2

Batters

Batting position 1

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 88.88, while CricketArchive lists it as 88.89. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Fours Sixes Dot balls Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 16 18 3 0 12 88.89 bowled
ESPNcricinfo 16 18 3 0   88.88 bowled
ICC 16 18 3 0   88.88 bowled
Batting position 4

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 66.66, while CricketArchive lists it as 66.67. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Fours Sixes Dot balls Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 2 3 0 0 1 66.67 run out
ESPNcricinfo 2 3 0 0   66.66 run out
ICC 2 3 0 0   66.66 run out

Bowlers

Bowler position 1

This bowler has an unacceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the economy rate as 2.45, while CricketArchive lists it as 3.0. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 but this is outside that and is thus unacceptable.

This bowler has an unacceptable difference noted in the overs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the overs as 3.4, while CricketArchive lists it as 2.4.

This bowler has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the runs as 9, while CricketArchive lists it as 8.

This bowler has an unacceptable difference noted in the dot balls shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the dot balls as 17, while CricketArchive lists it as 11.

This bowler has an unacceptable difference noted in the wides shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the wides as 1, while CricketArchive lists it as 0.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Wides Noballs Dot balls Fours Sixes Economy rate
CricketArchive 2.4 0 8 0 0 0 11 1 0 3.0
ESPNcricinfo 3.4 0 9 0 1 0 17 1 0 2.45
ICC 3.4 0 9 0           2.45
Bowler position 2

This bowler has an unacceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the economy rate as 7.0, while CricketArchive lists it as 5.5. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 but this is outside that and is thus unacceptable.

This bowler has an unacceptable difference noted in the overs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the overs as 3.0, while CricketArchive lists it as 4.0.

This bowler has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the runs as 21, while CricketArchive lists it as 22.

This bowler has an unacceptable difference noted in the dot balls shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the dot balls as 11, while CricketArchive lists it as 17.

This bowler has an unacceptable difference noted in the wides shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the wides as 1, while CricketArchive lists it as 2.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Wides Noballs Dot balls Fours Sixes Economy rate
CricketArchive 4.0 0 22 1 2 0 17 3 0 5.5
ESPNcricinfo 3.0 0 21 1 1 0 11 3 0 7.0
ICC 3.0 0 21 1           7.0