ID
1173050
Match type
T20
Dates
Feb 22
Teams
New Zealand, Sri Lanka
Gender
female
Sources
CricketArchive, ESPNcricinfo, ICC
Status
Mismatch
Number of errors
1
Comparison data
JSON

Discrepancies

Innings 1

Batters

Batting position 1

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 71.42, while CricketArchive lists it as 71.43. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 20 28 2 0 71.43 bowled
ESPNcricinfo 20 28 2 0 71.42 bowled
ICC 20 28 2 0 71.42 bowled
Batting position 2

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the balls shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the balls as 30, while ICC lists it as 31.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the strike rate as 136.66, ICC lists it as 132.25, while CricketArchive lists it as 136.67. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 but this is outside that and is thus unacceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 41 30 5 2 136.67 caught and bowled
ESPNcricinfo 41 30 5 2 136.66 caught and bowled
ICC 41 31 5 2 132.25 caught and bowled
Batting position 3

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 71.42, while CricketArchive lists it as 71.43. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 15 21 0 0 71.43 caught
ESPNcricinfo 15 21 0 0 71.42 caught
ICC 15 21 0 0 71.42 caught
Batting position 4

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 103.84, while CricketArchive lists it as 103.85. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Fours Sixes Strike rate
CricketArchive 27 26 1 1 103.85
ESPNcricinfo 27 26 1 1 103.84
ICC 27 26 1 1 103.84
Batting position 6

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 66.66, while CricketArchive lists it as 66.67. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 4 6 0 0 66.67 caught
ESPNcricinfo 4 6 0 0 66.66 caught
ICC 4 6 0 0 66.66 caught

Innings 2

Bowlers

Bowler position 6

This bowler has an acceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the economy rate as 8.66, while CricketArchive lists it as 8.67. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Wides Noballs Dot balls Fours Sixes Economy rate
CricketArchive 3.0 0 26 1 0 0 4 1 1 8.67
ESPNcricinfo 3.0 0 26 1 0 0 4 1 1 8.66
ICC 3.0 0 26 1           8.66