- ID
- 1173051
- Match type
- T20
- Dates
- Feb 23
- Teams
- England, South Africa
- Gender
- female
- Sources
- CricketArchive, ECB, ESPNcricinfo, ICC
- Status
- Mismatch
- Number of errors
- 3
- Comparison data
- JSON

## Discrepancies

### Innings 1

#### Batters

##### Batting position 4

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the *strike rate* shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, ECB, and ICC list the strike rate as 42.85, while CricketArchive lists it as 42.86. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as *0.01* so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source | Runs | Balls | Fours | Sixes | Dot balls | Strike rate | Method of dismissal |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

CricketArchive | 6 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 42.86 | caught |

ECB | 6 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 42.85 | caught | |

ESPNcricinfo | 6 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 42.85 | caught | |

ICC | 6 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 42.85 | caught |

##### Batting position 5

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the *strike rate* shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, ECB, and ICC list the strike rate as 66.66, while CricketArchive lists it as 66.67. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as *0.01* so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source | Runs | Balls | Fours | Sixes | Dot balls | Strike rate | Method of dismissal |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

CricketArchive | 14 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 66.67 | caught |

ECB | 14 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 66.66 | caught | |

ESPNcricinfo | 14 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 66.66 | caught | |

ICC | 14 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 66.66 | caught |

### Innings 2

#### Total

This innings has an unacceptable difference noted in the *runs* shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the runs as 127, while CricketArchive, and ECB list it as 124.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source | Runs | Wickets |
---|---|---|

CricketArchive | 124 | 4 |

ECB | 124 | 4 |

ESPNcricinfo | 127 | 4 |

ICC | 127 | 4 |

#### Batters

##### Batting position 2

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the *strike rate* shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, ECB, and ICC list the strike rate as 90.19, while CricketArchive lists it as 90.2. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as *0.01* so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source | Runs | Balls | Fours | Sixes | Dot balls | Strike rate | Method of dismissal |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

CricketArchive | 46 | 51 | 2 | 2 | 23 | 90.2 | caught |

ECB | 46 | 51 | 2 | 2 | 90.19 | caught | |

ESPNcricinfo | 46 | 51 | 2 | 2 | 90.19 | caught | |

ICC | 46 | 51 | 2 | 2 | 90.19 | caught |

##### Batting position 5

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the *fours* shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the fours as 1, while CricketArchive, and ECB list it as 0.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the *runs* shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the runs as 18, while CricketArchive, and ECB list it as 15.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the *strike rate* shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 163.63, while CricketArchive, and ECB list it as 136.36. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as *0.01* but this is outside that and is thus unacceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source | Runs | Balls | Fours | Sixes | Dot balls | Strike rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

CricketArchive | 15 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 136.36 |

ECB | 15 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 136.36 | |

ESPNcricinfo | 18 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 163.63 | |

ICC | 18 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 163.63 |

#### Bowlers

##### Bowler position 2

This bowler has an unacceptable difference noted in the *economy rate* shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the economy rate as 6.27, while CricketArchive, and ECB list it as 5.45. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as *0.01* but this is outside that and is thus unacceptable.

This bowler has an unacceptable difference noted in the *runs* shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the runs as 23, while CricketArchive, and ECB list it as 20.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source | Overs | Maidens | Runs | Wickets | Wides | Noballs | Dot balls | Fours | Sixes | Economy rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

CricketArchive | 3.4 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 5.45 |

ECB | 3.4 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 5.45 | |||||

ESPNcricinfo | 3.4 | 0 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 6.27 |

ICC | 3.4 | 0 | 23 | 0 | 6.27 |