ID
1173058
Match type
T20
Dates
Feb 28
Teams
South Africa, Thailand
Gender
female
Sources
CricketArchive, ESPNcricinfo, ICC
Status
Mismatch
Number of errors
3
Comparison data
JSON

Discrepancies

Innings 1

Extras

This innings has an unacceptable difference noted in the legbyes shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the legbyes as 1, while CricketArchive lists it as 2.

This innings has an unacceptable difference noted in the total shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the total as 4, while CricketArchive lists it as 5.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Total Legbyes Noballs Wides
CricketArchive 5 2 1 2
ESPNcricinfo 4 1 1 2
ICC 4 1 1 2

Batters

Batting position 5

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the runs as 3, while CricketArchive lists it as 2.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 150.0, while CricketArchive lists it as 100.0. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 but this is outside that and is thus unacceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Fours Sixes Dot balls Strike rate
CricketArchive 2 2 0 0 1 100.0
ESPNcricinfo 3 2 0 0   150.0
ICC 3 2 0 0   150.0

Bowlers

Bowler position 6

This bowler has an unacceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the economy rate as 10.66, while CricketArchive lists it as 10.33. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 but this is outside that and is thus unacceptable.

This bowler has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the runs as 32, while CricketArchive lists it as 31.

This bowler has an unacceptable difference noted in the dot balls shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the dot balls as 8, while CricketArchive lists it as 9.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Wides Noballs Dot balls Fours Sixes Economy rate
CricketArchive 3.0 0 31 1 0 1 9 2 2 10.33
ESPNcricinfo 3.0 0 32 1 0 1 8 2 2 10.66
ICC 3.0 0 32 1           10.66

Innings 2

Batters

Batting position 1

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 54.54, while CricketArchive lists it as 54.55. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Fours Sixes Dot balls Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 6 11 1 0 8 54.55 run out
ESPNcricinfo 6 11 1 0   54.54 run out
ICC 6 11 1 0   54.54 run out
Batting position 2

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 25.8, while CricketArchive lists it as 25.81. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Fours Sixes Dot balls Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 8 31 0 0 23 25.81 stumped
ESPNcricinfo 8 31 0 0   25.8 stumped
ICC 8 31 0 0   25.8 stumped
Batting position 6

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 123.8, while CricketArchive lists it as 123.81. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Fours Sixes Dot balls Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 26 21 3 1 11 123.81 caught
ESPNcricinfo 26 21 3 1   123.8 caught
ICC 26 21 3 1   123.8 caught

Bowlers

Bowler position 2

This bowler has an acceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the economy rate as 2.52, while CricketArchive lists it as 2.53. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Wides Noballs Dot balls Fours Sixes Economy rate
CricketArchive 3.1 1 8 3 0 0 14 1 0 2.53
ESPNcricinfo 3.1 1 8 3 0 0 14 1 0 2.52
ICC 3.1 1 8 3           2.52
Bowler position 6

This bowler has an acceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the economy rate as 5.66, while CricketArchive lists it as 5.67. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Wides Noballs Dot balls Fours Sixes Economy rate
CricketArchive 3.0 0 17 1 0 1 10 1 0 5.67
ESPNcricinfo 3.0 0 17 1 0 1 10 1 0 5.66
ICC 3.0 0 17 1           5.66