ID
1173065
Match type
T20
Dates
Mar 2
Teams
Australia, New Zealand
Gender
female
Sources
CricketArchive, ESPNcricinfo, ICC
Status
Mismatch
Number of errors
1
Comparison data
JSON

Discrepancies

Innings 1

Batters

Batting position 3

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 123.52, while CricketArchive lists it as 123.53. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Fours Sixes Dot balls Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 21 17 4 0 8 123.53 caught
ESPNcricinfo 21 17 4 0   123.52 caught
ICC 21 17 4 0   123.52 caught
Batting position 5

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the method of dismissal shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the method of dismissal as bowled, while CricketArchive lists it as stumped.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Fours Sixes Dot balls Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 21 15 2 0 2 140.0 stumped
ESPNcricinfo 21 15 2 0   140.0 bowled
ICC 21 15 2 0   140.0 bowled

Bowlers

Bowler position 3

This bowler has an acceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the economy rate as 8.66, while CricketArchive lists it as 8.67. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Wides Noballs Dot balls Fours Sixes Economy rate
CricketArchive 3.0 0 26 1 0 0 3 2 1 8.67
ESPNcricinfo 3.0 0 26 1 0 0 3 2 1 8.66
ICC 3.0 0 26 1           8.66

Innings 2

Batters

Batting position 4

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 121.73, while CricketArchive lists it as 121.74. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Fours Sixes Dot balls Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 28 23 2 2 11 121.74 stumped
ESPNcricinfo 28 23 2 2   121.73 stumped
ICC 28 23 2 2   121.73 stumped
Batting position 5

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 205.55, while CricketArchive lists it as 205.56. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Fours Sixes Dot balls Strike rate
CricketArchive 37 18 4 1 0 205.56
ESPNcricinfo 37 18 4 1   205.55
ICC 37 18 4 1   205.55