Match type
Test
Teams
Australia vs New Zealand
Gender
male
Dates
Jan 3 - Jan 6
Sources
CricketArchive, ESPNcricinfo, ICC
Status
Mismatch
Number of errors
10

The discrepancies in this match have been identified and can be attributed to the following sources:

  • ICC

The ICC have correctly added 5 penalty runs to the New Zealand 1st innings (due to running on the pitch in the 2nd Australian innings), however they have incorrectly applied it from the start of that completed innings (rather than the end) which throws the fall of wicket figures off by 5 runs.

Discrepancies

Innings 1

Batters

Batting position 3

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. For strike rate, ESPNcricinfo shows 59.23, while ICC shows 59.22; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Batter M Labuschagne Marnus Labuschagne Marnus Labuschagne
Runs 215 215 215
Balls 363 363 363
Minutes 516 516  
Fours 19 19 19
Sixes 1 1 1
Method of dismissal caught and bowled caught and bowled caught and bowled
Strike rate   59.23 59.22
Batting position 4

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. For strike rate, ESPNcricinfo shows 34.62, while ICC shows 34.61; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Batter SPD Smith Steven Smith Steve Smith
Runs 63 63 63
Balls 182 182 182
Minutes 217 217  
Fours 4 4 4
Sixes 0 0 0
Method of dismissal caught caught caught
Strike rate   34.62 34.61
Batting position 6

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. For strike rate, ESPNcricinfo shows 23.81, while ICC shows 23.8; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Batter TM Head Travis Head Travis Head
Runs 10 10 10
Balls 42 42 42
Minutes 80 80  
Fours 1 1 1
Sixes 0 0 0
Method of dismissal caught caught caught
Strike rate   23.81 23.8
Batting position 9

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. For strike rate, ESPNcricinfo shows 66.67, while ICC shows 66.66; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Batter PJ Cummins Pat Cummins Pat Cummins
Runs 8 8 8
Balls 12 12 12
Minutes 19 19  
Fours 1 1 1
Sixes 0 0 0
Method of dismissal caught caught caught
Strike rate   66.67 66.66
Batting position 11

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. For strike rate, ESPNcricinfo shows 31.58, while ICC shows 31.57; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Batter NM Lyon Nathan Lyon Nathan Lyon
Runs 6 6 6
Balls 19 19 19
Minutes 24 24  
Fours 1 1 1
Sixes 0 0 0
Strike rate   31.58 31.57

Bowlers

Bowler position 1

This bowler has an acceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. For economy rate, ESPNcricinfo shows 2.94, while ICC shows 2.93; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Bowler Henry Matt Henry Matt Henry
Overs 32.0 32.0 32.0
Maidens 3 3 3
Runs 94 94 94
Wickets 1 1 1
Wides 1 1  
Noballs 0 0  
Dot balls 135   135
Fours 8    
Sixes 0    
Economy rate   2.94 2.93
Bowler position 3

This bowler has an acceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. For economy rate, ESPNcricinfo shows 1.99, while ICC shows 1.98; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Bowler Wagner Neil Wagner Neil Wagner
Overs 33.1 33.1 33.1
Maidens 9 9 9
Runs 66 66 66
Wickets 3 3 3
Wides 0 0  
Noballs 0 0  
Dot balls 162   162
Fours 5    
Sixes 1    
Economy rate   1.99 1.98
Bowler position 5

This bowler has an acceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. For economy rate, ESPNcricinfo shows 3.47, while ICC shows 3.46; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Bowler Astle Todd Astle Todd Astle
Overs 32.0 32.0 32.0
Maidens 0 0 0
Runs 111 111 111
Wickets 2 2 2
Wides 0 0  
Noballs 0 0  
Dot balls 122   122
Fours 8    
Sixes 1    
Economy rate   3.47 3.46

Innings 2

Batters

Batting position 3

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. For strike rate, ESPNcricinfo shows 53.45, while ICC shows 53.44; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Batter JA Raval Jeet Raval Jeet Raval
Runs 31 31 31
Balls 58 58 58
Minutes 70 70  
Fours 4 4 4
Sixes 0 0 0
Method of dismissal lbw lbw lbw
Strike rate   53.45 53.44
Batting position 5

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. For strike rate, ESPNcricinfo shows 45.22, while ICC shows 45.21; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Batter GD Phillips Glenn Phillips Glenn Phillips
Runs 52 52 52
Balls 115 115 115
Minutes 178 178  
Fours 6 6 6
Sixes 1 1 1
Method of dismissal bowled bowled bowled
Strike rate   45.22 45.21

Bowlers

Bowler position 3

This bowler has an acceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. For economy rate, ESPNcricinfo shows 3.63, while ICC shows 3.62; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Bowler JL Pattinson James Pattinson James Pattinson
Overs 16.0 16.0 16.0
Maidens 3 3 3
Runs 58 58 58
Wickets 0 0 0
Wides 0 0  
Noballs 1 1  
Dot balls 71   71
Fours 9    
Sixes 0    
Economy rate   3.63 3.62
Bowler position 4

This bowler has an acceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. For economy rate, ESPNcricinfo shows 2.22, while ICC shows 2.21; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Bowler NM Lyon Nathan Lyon Nathan Lyon
Overs 30.4 30.4 30.4
Maidens 10 10 10
Runs 68 68 68
Wickets 5 5 5
Wides 0 0  
Noballs 0 0  
Dot balls 152   152
Fours 8    
Sixes 0    
Economy rate   2.22 2.21

Fall of wickets

Fall of wicket 1

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. For runs, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 68, while ICC shows 73.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Wicket 1 1 1
Runs 68 68 73
Ball 33.5 33.5 33.5
Fall of wicket 2

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. For runs, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 117, while ICC shows 122.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Wicket 2 2 2
Runs 117 117 122
Ball 48.6 48.6 48.6
Fall of wicket 3

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. For runs, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 117, while ICC shows 122.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Wicket 3 3 3
Runs 117 117 122
Ball 49.2 49.2 49.2
Fall of wicket 4

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. For runs, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 145, while ICC shows 150.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Wicket 4 4 4
Runs 145 145 150
Ball 56.1 56.1 56.1
Fall of wicket 5

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. For runs, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 163, while ICC shows 168.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Wicket 5 5 5
Runs 163 163 168
Ball 66.5 66.5 66.5
Fall of wicket 6

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. For runs, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 195, while ICC shows 200.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Wicket 6 6 6
Runs 195 195 200
Ball 75.1 75.1 75.1
Fall of wicket 7

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. For runs, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 235, while ICC shows 240.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Wicket 7 7 7
Runs 235 235 240
Ball 87.6 87.6 87.6
Fall of wicket 8

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. For runs, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 237, while ICC shows 242.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Wicket 8 8 8
Runs 237 237 242
Ball 91.4 91.4 91.4
Fall of wicket 9

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. For runs, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 237, while ICC shows 242.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Wicket 9 9 9
Runs 237 237 242
Ball 91.6 91.6 91.6
Fall of wicket 10

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. For runs, ESPNcricinfo, and ICC show 256, while CricketArchive shows 251.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Wicket 10 10 10
Runs 251 256 256
Ball 95.4 95.4 95.4

Innings 3

Batters

Batting position 3

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. For strike rate, ESPNcricinfo shows 79.73, while ICC shows 79.72; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Batter M Labuschagne Marnus Labuschagne Marnus Labuschagne
Runs 59 59 59
Balls 74 74 74
Minutes 97 97  
Fours 3 3 3
Sixes 0 0 0
Method of dismissal caught caught caught
Strike rate   79.73 79.72

Bowlers

Bowler position 2

This bowler has an acceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. For economy rate, ESPNcricinfo shows 3.31, while ICC shows 3.3; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Bowler de Grandhomme Colin de Grandhomme Colin de Grandhomme
Overs 13.0 13.0 13.0
Maidens 1 1 1
Runs 43 43 43
Wickets 0 0 0
Wides 0 0  
Noballs 0 0  
Dot balls 51   51
Fours 2    
Sixes 0    
Economy rate   3.31 3.3
Bowler position 5

This bowler has an acceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. For economy rate, ESPNcricinfo shows 5.13, while ICC shows 5.12; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Bowler Astle Todd Astle Todd Astle
Overs 8.0 8.0 8.0
Maidens 1 1 1
Runs 41 41 41
Wickets 1 1 1
Wides 0 0  
Noballs 0 0  
Dot balls 23   23
Fours 2    
Sixes 1    
Economy rate   5.13 5.12

Innings 4

Batters

Batting position 1

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. For strike rate, ESPNcricinfo shows 6.67, while ICC shows 6.66; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Batter TWM Latham Tom Latham Tom Latham
Runs 1 1 1
Balls 15 15 15
Minutes 24 24  
Fours 0 0 0
Sixes 0 0 0
Method of dismissal lbw lbw lbw
Strike rate   6.67 6.66
Batting position 3

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. For strike rate, ESPNcricinfo shows 70.59, while ICC shows 70.58; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Batter JA Raval Jeet Raval Jeet Raval
Runs 12 12 12
Balls 17 17 17
Minutes 36 36  
Fours 1 1 1
Sixes 0 0 0
Method of dismissal caught caught caught
Strike rate   70.59 70.58

Bowlers

Bowler position 1

This bowler has an acceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. For economy rate, ESPNcricinfo shows 2.78, while ICC shows 2.77; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Bowler MA Starc Mitchell Starc Mitchell Starc
Overs 9.0 9.0 9.0
Maidens 3 3 3
Runs 25 25 25
Wickets 3 3 3
Wides 0 0  
Noballs 0 0  
Dot balls 40   40
Fours 2    
Sixes 0    
Economy rate   2.78 2.77
Bowler position 2

This bowler has an acceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. For economy rate, ESPNcricinfo shows 2.64, while ICC shows 2.63; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Bowler PJ Cummins Pat Cummins Pat Cummins
Overs 11.0 11.0 11.0
Maidens 3 3 3
Runs 29 29 29
Wickets 1 1 1
Wides 0 0  
Noballs 0 0  
Dot balls 50   50
Fours 2    
Sixes 0    
Economy rate   2.64 2.63