ID
1185316
Match type
T20
Dates
Feb 21
Teams
Australia, South Africa
Gender
male
Sources
CricketArchive, ESPNcricinfo, ICC
Status
Mismatch
Number of errors
1
Comparison data
JSON

Discrepancies

Innings 1

Batters

Batting position 2

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 155.55, while CricketArchive lists it as 155.56. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Dot balls Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 42 27 38 6 1 11 155.56 caught
ESPNcricinfo 42 27 38 6 1   155.55 caught
ICC 42 27   6 1   155.55 caught
Batting position 4

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 163.63, while CricketArchive lists it as 163.64. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Dot balls Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 18 11 16 2 0 3 163.64 caught
ESPNcricinfo 18 11 16 2 0   163.63 caught
ICC 18 11   2 0   163.63 caught
Batting position 6

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 122.72, while CricketArchive lists it as 122.73. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Dot balls Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 27 22 26 3 1 10 122.73 caught
ESPNcricinfo 27 22 26 3 1   122.72 caught
ICC 27 22   3 1   122.72 caught

Fall of wickets

Fall of wicket 4

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the ball shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the ball as 11.6, while ICC lists it as 12.0.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Wicket Runs Ball
CricketArchive 4 117 11.6
ESPNcricinfo 4 117 11.6
ICC 4 117 12.0

Innings 2

Batters

Batting position 1

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 66.66, while CricketArchive lists it as 66.67. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Dot balls Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 2 3 2 0 0 2 66.67 bowled
ESPNcricinfo 2 3 2 0 0   66.66 bowled
ICC 2 3   0 0   66.66 bowled
Batting position 6

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 106.66, while CricketArchive lists it as 106.67. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Dot balls Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 16 15 26 2 0 6 106.67 bowled
ESPNcricinfo 16 15 26 2 0   106.66 bowled
ICC 16 15   2 0   106.66 bowled
Batting position 9

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 115.78, while CricketArchive lists it as 115.79. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Dot balls Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 22 19 26 1 2 10 115.79 bowled
ESPNcricinfo 22 19 26 1 2   115.78 bowled
ICC 22 19   1 2   115.78 bowled

Bowlers

Bowler position 1

This bowler has an acceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the economy rate as 7.66, while CricketArchive lists it as 7.67. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Wides Noballs Dot balls Fours Sixes Economy rate
CricketArchive 3.0 0 23 1 3 0 12 3 0 7.67
ESPNcricinfo 3.0 0 23 1 3 0 12 3 0 7.66
ICC 3.0 0 23 1           7.66
Bowler position 2

This bowler has an acceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the economy rate as 6.66, while CricketArchive lists it as 6.67. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Wides Noballs Dot balls Fours Sixes Economy rate
CricketArchive 3.0 0 20 0 0 0 7 1 1 6.67
ESPNcricinfo 3.0 0 20 0 0 0 7 1 1 6.66
ICC 3.0 0 20 0           6.66