ID
1187714
Match type
ODI
Dates
Jan 25
Teams
New Zealand, South Africa
Gender
female
Sources
CricketArchive, ESPNcricinfo, ICC
Status
Mismatch
Number of errors
8
Comparison data
JSON

Discrepancies

Innings 1

Batters

Batting position 2

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 73.52, while CricketArchive lists it as 73.53. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 25 34 56 3 0 73.53 caught
ESPNcricinfo 25 34 56 3 0 73.52 caught
ICC 25 34   3 0 73.52 caught
Batting position 3

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the balls shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the balls as 75, while ICC lists it as 76.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the strike rate as 70.66, ICC lists it as 69.73, while CricketArchive lists it as 70.67. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 but this is outside that and is thus unacceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 53 75 94 3 0 70.67 caught
ESPNcricinfo 53 75 94 3 0 70.66 caught
ICC 53 76   3 0 69.73 caught
Batting position 4

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 87.09, while CricketArchive lists it as 87.1. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the minutes shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the minutes as 34, while CricketArchive lists it as 33.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 27 31 33 3 0 87.1 caught
ESPNcricinfo 27 31 34 3 0 87.09 caught
ICC 27 31   3 0 87.09 caught
Batting position 5

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 93.97, while CricketArchive lists it as 93.98. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 78 83 102 6 0 93.98 caught and bowled
ESPNcricinfo 78 83 102 6 0 93.97 caught and bowled
ICC 78 83   6 0 93.97 caught and bowled
Batting position 6

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the minutes shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the minutes as 31, while CricketArchive lists it as 30.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 21 22 30 3 0 95.45 caught
ESPNcricinfo 21 22 31 3 0 95.45 caught
ICC 21 22   3 0 95.45 caught
Batting position 7

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the minutes shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the minutes as 12, while CricketArchive lists it as 11.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 6 10 11 0 0 60.0 caught
ESPNcricinfo 6 10 12 0 0 60.0 caught
ICC 6 10   0 0 60.0 caught
Batting position 8

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 181.81, while CricketArchive lists it as 181.82. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 20 11 19 2 1 181.82 caught
ESPNcricinfo 20 11 19 2 1 181.81 caught
ICC 20 11   2 1 181.81 caught

Bowlers

Bowler position 4

This bowler has an acceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the economy rate as 5.37, while CricketArchive lists it as 5.38. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

This bowler has an unacceptable difference noted in the wickets shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the wickets as 3, while ICC lists it as 4.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Wides Noballs Economy rate
CricketArchive 8.0 0 43 3 1 0 5.38
ESPNcricinfo 8.0 0 43 3 1 0 5.37
ICC 8.0 0 43 4     5.37

Fall of wickets

Fall of wicket 4

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the ball shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the ball as 33.3, while ICC lists it as 33.4.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Wicket Runs Ball
CricketArchive 4 146 33.3
ESPNcricinfo 4 146 33.3
ICC 4 146 33.4

Innings 2

Batters

Batting position 2

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 73.38, while CricketArchive lists it as 73.39. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the minutes shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the minutes as 188, while CricketArchive lists it as 189.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Strike rate
CricketArchive 91 124 189 9 0 73.39
ESPNcricinfo 91 124 188 9 0 73.38
ICC 91 124   9 0 73.38
Batting position 3

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 78.94, while CricketArchive lists it as 78.95. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 15 19 14 2 0 78.95 caught
ESPNcricinfo 15 19 14 2 0 78.94 caught
ICC 15 19   2 0 78.94 caught
Batting position 4

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 86.04, while CricketArchive lists it as 86.05. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the minutes shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the minutes as 49, while CricketArchive lists it as 48.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 37 43 48 4 0 86.05 lbw
ESPNcricinfo 37 43 49 4 0 86.04 lbw
ICC 37 43   4 0 86.04 lbw

Bowlers

Bowler position 2

This bowler has an acceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the economy rate as 6.3, while CricketArchive lists it as 6.31. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Wides Noballs Economy rate
CricketArchive 6.3 0 41 1 2 0 6.31
ESPNcricinfo 6.3 0 41 1 2 0 6.3
ICC 6.3 0 41 1     6.3
Bowler position 6

This bowler has an acceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the economy rate as 4.55, while CricketArchive lists it as 4.56. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Wides Noballs Economy rate
CricketArchive 9.0 0 41 0 0 0 4.56
ESPNcricinfo 9.0 0 41 0 0 0 4.55
ICC 9.0 0 41 0     4.55
Bowler position 7

This bowler has an acceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the economy rate as 6.85, while CricketArchive lists it as 6.86. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Wides Noballs Economy rate
CricketArchive 3.3 0 24 1 1 0 6.86
ESPNcricinfo 3.3 0 24 1 1 0 6.85
ICC 3.3 0 24 1     6.85