Match type
ODI
Teams
New Zealand vs South Africa
Gender
female
Dates
Jan 30
Sources
CricketArchive, ESPNcricinfo, ICC
Status
Mismatch
Number of errors
12

The discrepancies in this match have been identified and can be attributed to the following sources:

  • ICC
  • ESPNcricinfo

ICC commentary is missing delivery 16.5 in the 1st innings, resulting in most of the discrepancies for this match. The total, fall of wickets, Devine, and Tryon discrepancies are all caused by this single omission.

Cricinfo scorecard incorrectly lists Bates as having faced 57 rather than 58 deliveries. I've confirmed that Cricinfo is incorrect by checking the videos for deliveries 6.6, 6.7, and 7.1 on the official New Zealand cricket site.

Discrepancies

Innings 1

Total

This innings has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. For runs, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 149, while ICC shows 147.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Runs 149 149 147
Wickets 10 10 10

Batters

Batting position 3

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the balls, and strike rate shown on each scorecard. For balls, ESPNcricinfo shows 57, while CricketArchive, and ICC show 58. For strike rate, ESPNcricinfo shows 89.47, while CricketArchive, and ICC show 87.93; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 this is outside that and thus unacceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Batter SW Bates Suzie Bates Suzie Bates
Runs 51 51 51
Balls 58 57 58
Minutes 80 80  
Fours 6 6 6
Sixes 0 0 0
Strike rate 87.93 89.47 87.93
Method of dismissal caught caught caught
Batting position 4

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the balls, runs, and strike rate shown on each scorecard. For balls, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 37, while ICC shows 36. For runs, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 24, while ICC shows 22. For strike rate, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 64.86, while ICC shows 61.11; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 this is outside that and thus unacceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Batter Devine Sophie Devine Sophie Devine
Runs 24 24 22
Balls 37 37 36
Minutes 46 46  
Fours 1 1 1
Sixes 0 0 0
Strike rate 64.86 64.86 61.11
Method of dismissal lbw lbw lbw
Batting position 6

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. For strike rate, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 54.35, while ICC shows 54.34; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Batter KJ Martin Katey Martin Katey Martin
Runs 25 25 25
Balls 46 46 46
Minutes 47 47  
Fours 1 1 1
Sixes 0 0 0
Strike rate 54.35 54.35 54.34
Method of dismissal bowled bowled bowled
Batting position 7

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. For strike rate, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 63.16, while ICC shows 63.15; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Batter AC Kerr Amelia Kerr Amelia Kerr
Runs 12 12 12
Balls 19 19 19
Minutes 24 24  
Fours 0 0 0
Sixes 0 0 0
Strike rate 63.16 63.16 63.15
Method of dismissal stumped stumped stumped
Batting position 9

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. For strike rate, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 55.56, while ICC shows 55.55; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Batter Kasperek Leigh Kasperek Leigh Kasperek
Runs 10 10 10
Balls 18 18 18
Minutes 18 18  
Fours 1 1 1
Sixes 0 0 0
Strike rate 55.56 55.56 55.55

Bowlers

Bowler position 5

This bowler has an unacceptable difference noted in the economy rate, and runs shown on each scorecard. For economy rate, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 4.33, while ICC shows 4.0; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 this is outside that and thus unacceptable. For runs, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 26, while ICC shows 24.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Bowler CL Tryon Chloe Tryon Chloe Tryon
Overs 6.0 6.0 6.0
Maidens 0 0 0
Runs 26 26 24
Wickets 0 0 0
Wides 0 0  
Noballs 0 0  
Economy rate 4.33 4.33 4.0
Dot balls     18

Fall of wickets

Fall of wicket 3

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. For runs, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 73, while ICC shows 71.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Wicket 3 3 3
Runs 73 73 71
Ball 17.4 17.4 17.4
Fall of wicket 4

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. For runs, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 96, while ICC shows 94.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Wicket 4 4 4
Runs 96 96 94
Ball 22.4 22.4 22.4
Fall of wicket 5

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. For runs, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 106, while ICC shows 104.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Wicket 5 5 5
Runs 106 106 104
Ball 24.1 24.1 24.1
Fall of wicket 6

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. For runs, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 134, while ICC shows 132.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Wicket 6 6 6
Runs 134 134 132
Ball 32.2 32.2 32.2
Fall of wicket 7

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. For runs, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 134, while ICC shows 132.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Wicket 7 7 7
Runs 134 134 132
Ball 32.4 32.4 32.4
Fall of wicket 8

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. For runs, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 143, while ICC shows 141.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Wicket 8 8 8
Runs 143 143 141
Ball 36.2 36.2 36.2
Fall of wicket 9

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. For runs, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 143, while ICC shows 141.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Wicket 9 9 9
Runs 143 143 141
Ball 36.3 36.3 36.3
Fall of wicket 10

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. For runs, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 149, while ICC shows 147.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Wicket 10 10 10
Runs 149 149 147
Ball 38.1 38.1 38.1

Innings 2

Batters

Batting position 1

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. For strike rate, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 86.96, while ICC shows 86.95; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Batter L Lee Lizelle Lee Lizelle Lee
Runs 20 20 20
Balls 23 23 23
Minutes 26 26  
Fours 4 4 4
Sixes 0 0 0
Strike rate 86.96 86.96 86.95
Method of dismissal caught caught caught
Batting position 5

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. For strike rate, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 74.47, while ICC shows 74.46; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Batter M du Preez Mignon du Preez Mignon du Preez
Runs 35 35 35
Balls 47 47 47
Minutes 62 62  
Fours 6 6 6
Sixes 0 0 0
Strike rate 74.47 74.47 74.46

Bowlers

Bowler position 3

This bowler has an acceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. For economy rate, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 5.67, while ICC shows 5.66; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source CricketArchive ESPNcricinfo ICC
Bowler JM Kerr Jess Kerr Jess Kerr
Overs 3.0 3.0 3.0
Maidens 1 1 1
Runs 17 17 17
Wickets 1 1 1
Wides 1 1  
Noballs 0 0  
Economy rate 5.67 5.67 5.66
Dot balls     14