ID
1187716
Match type
ODI
Dates
Jan 30
Teams
New Zealand, South Africa
Gender
female
Sources
CricketArchive, ESPNcricinfo, ICC
Status
Mismatch
Number of errors
12
Comparison data
JSON

Discrepancies

Innings 1

Total

This innings has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the runs as 149, while ICC lists it as 147.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Wickets
CricketArchive 149 10
ESPNcricinfo 149 10
ICC 147 10

Batters

Batting position 3

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the balls shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the balls as 57, while CricketArchive, and ICC list it as 58.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the strike rate as 89.47, while CricketArchive, and ICC list it as 87.93. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 but this is outside that and is thus unacceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 51 58 80 6 0 87.93 caught
ESPNcricinfo 51 57 80 6 0 89.47 caught
ICC 51 58   6 0 87.93 caught
Batting position 4

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the balls shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the balls as 37, while ICC lists it as 36.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the runs as 24, while ICC lists it as 22.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the strike rate as 64.86, while ICC lists it as 61.11. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 but this is outside that and is thus unacceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 24 37 46 1 0 64.86 lbw
ESPNcricinfo 24 37 46 1 0 64.86 lbw
ICC 22 36   1 0 61.11 lbw
Batting position 6

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 54.34, while CricketArchive lists it as 54.35. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 25 46 47 1 0 54.35 bowled
ESPNcricinfo 25 46 47 1 0 54.34 bowled
ICC 25 46   1 0 54.34 bowled
Batting position 7

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 63.15, while CricketArchive lists it as 63.16. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 12 19 24 0 0 63.16 stumped
ESPNcricinfo 12 19 24 0 0 63.15 stumped
ICC 12 19   0 0 63.15 stumped
Batting position 9

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 55.55, while CricketArchive lists it as 55.56. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Strike rate
CricketArchive 10 18 18 1 0 55.56
ESPNcricinfo 10 18 18 1 0 55.55
ICC 10 18   1 0 55.55

Bowlers

Bowler position 5

This bowler has an unacceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the economy rate as 4.33, while ICC lists it as 4.0. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 but this is outside that and is thus unacceptable.

This bowler has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the runs as 26, while ICC lists it as 24.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Wides Noballs Economy rate
CricketArchive 6.0 0 26 0 0 0 4.33
ESPNcricinfo 6.0 0 26 0 0 0 4.33
ICC 6.0 0 24 0     4.0

Fall of wickets

Fall of wicket 3

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the runs as 73, while ICC lists it as 71.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Wicket Runs Ball
CricketArchive 3 73 17.4
ESPNcricinfo 3 73 17.4
ICC 3 71 17.4
Fall of wicket 4

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the runs as 96, while ICC lists it as 94.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Wicket Runs Ball
CricketArchive 4 96 22.4
ESPNcricinfo 4 96 22.4
ICC 4 94 22.4
Fall of wicket 5

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the runs as 106, while ICC lists it as 104.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Wicket Runs Ball
CricketArchive 5 106 24.1
ESPNcricinfo 5 106 24.1
ICC 5 104 24.1
Fall of wicket 6

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the runs as 134, while ICC lists it as 132.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Wicket Runs Ball
CricketArchive 6 134 32.2
ESPNcricinfo 6 134 32.2
ICC 6 132 32.2
Fall of wicket 7

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the runs as 134, while ICC lists it as 132.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Wicket Runs Ball
CricketArchive 7 134 32.4
ESPNcricinfo 7 134 32.4
ICC 7 132 32.4
Fall of wicket 8

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the runs as 143, while ICC lists it as 141.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Wicket Runs Ball
CricketArchive 8 143 36.2
ESPNcricinfo 8 143 36.2
ICC 8 141 36.2
Fall of wicket 9

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the runs as 143, while ICC lists it as 141.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Wicket Runs Ball
CricketArchive 9 143 36.3
ESPNcricinfo 9 143 36.3
ICC 9 141 36.3
Fall of wicket 10

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the runs as 149, while ICC lists it as 147.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Wicket Runs Ball
CricketArchive 10 149 38.1
ESPNcricinfo 10 149 38.1
ICC 10 147 38.1

Innings 2

Batters

Batting position 1

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 86.95, while CricketArchive lists it as 86.96. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 20 23 26 4 0 86.96 caught
ESPNcricinfo 20 23 26 4 0 86.95 caught
ICC 20 23   4 0 86.95 caught
Batting position 5

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 74.46, while CricketArchive lists it as 74.47. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Strike rate
CricketArchive 35 47 62 6 0 74.47
ESPNcricinfo 35 47 62 6 0 74.46
ICC 35 47   6 0 74.46

Bowlers

Bowler position 3

This bowler has an acceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the economy rate as 5.66, while CricketArchive lists it as 5.67. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Wides Noballs Economy rate
CricketArchive 3.0 1 17 1 1 0 5.67
ESPNcricinfo 3.0 1 17 1 1 0 5.66
ICC 3.0 1 17 1     5.66