ID
1187719
Match type
T20
Dates
Feb 9
Teams
New Zealand, South Africa
Gender
female
Sources
CricketArchive, ESPNcricinfo, ICC
Status
Mismatch
Number of errors
3
Comparison data
JSON

Discrepancies

Innings 1

Batters

Batting position 2

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 135.08, while CricketArchive lists it as 135.09. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 77 57 73 7 4 135.09 caught
ESPNcricinfo 77 57   7 4 135.08 caught
ICC 77 57   7 4 135.08 caught
Batting position 3

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 127.77, while CricketArchive lists it as 127.78. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 23 18 26 2 0 127.78 run out
ESPNcricinfo 23 18   2 0 127.77 run out
ICC 23 18   2 0 127.77 run out

Bowlers

Bowler position 1

This bowler has an unacceptable difference noted in the wides shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the wides as 3, while CricketArchive lists it as 4.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Wides Noballs Economy rate
CricketArchive 4.0 0 31 0 4 0 7.75
ESPNcricinfo 4.0 0 31 0 3 0 7.75
ICC 4.0 0 31 0     7.75
Bowler position 3

This bowler has an acceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the economy rate as 4.66, while CricketArchive lists it as 4.67. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Wides Noballs Economy rate
CricketArchive 3.0 0 14 2 1 0 4.67
ESPNcricinfo 3.0 0 14 2 1 0 4.66
ICC 3.0 0 14 2     4.66

Innings 2

Batters

Batting position 5

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 104.54, while CricketArchive lists it as 104.55. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 23 22 24 1 1 104.55 bowled
ESPNcricinfo 23 22   1 1 104.54 bowled
ICC 23 22   1 1 104.54 bowled

Bowlers

Bowler position 1

This bowler has an acceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the economy rate as 4.66, while CricketArchive lists it as 4.67. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Wides Noballs Economy rate
CricketArchive 3.0 0 14 0 0 0 4.67
ESPNcricinfo 3.0 0 14 0 0 0 4.66
ICC 3.0 0 14 0     4.66
Bowler position 2

This bowler has an unacceptable difference noted in the wides shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the wides as 2, while CricketArchive lists it as 6.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Wides Noballs Economy rate
CricketArchive 3.5 0 38 2 6 0 9.91
ESPNcricinfo 3.5 0 38 2 2 0 9.91
ICC 3.5 0 38 2     9.91
Bowler position 3

This bowler has an acceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the economy rate as 10.66, while CricketArchive lists it as 10.67. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

This bowler has an unacceptable difference noted in the wides shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the wides as 1, while CricketArchive lists it as 2.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Wides Noballs Economy rate
CricketArchive 3.0 0 32 0 2 0 10.67
ESPNcricinfo 3.0 0 32 0 1 0 10.66
ICC 3.0 0 32 0     10.66