- Match type
- T20
- Teams
- New Zealand vs South Africa
- Gender
- female
- Dates
- Feb 10
- Sources
- CricketArchive, ESPNcricinfo, ICC
- Status
- Mismatch
- Number of errors
- 7
The discrepancies in this match have been identified and can be attributed to the following sources:
- ICC
Discrepancies
Innings 1
Total
This innings has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. For runs, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 171, while ICC shows 170.
The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:
Source | CricketArchive | ESPNcricinfo | ICC |
---|---|---|---|
Runs | 171 | 171 | 170 |
Wickets | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Batters
Batting position 1
This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. For strike rate, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 161.54, while ICC shows 161.53; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.
The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:
Source | CricketArchive | ESPNcricinfo | ICC |
---|---|---|---|
Batter | Devine | Sophie Devine | Sophie Devine |
Runs | 105 | 105 | 105 |
Balls | 65 | 65 | 65 |
Minutes | 73 | 73 | |
Fours | 12 | 12 | 12 |
Sixes | 3 | 3 | 3 |
Strike rate | 161.54 | 161.54 | 161.53 |
Method of dismissal | run out | run out | run out |
Batting position 3
This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs, and strike rate shown on each scorecard. For runs, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 47, while ICC shows 46. For strike rate, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 102.17, while ICC shows 100.0; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 this is outside that and thus unacceptable.
The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:
Source | CricketArchive | ESPNcricinfo | ICC |
---|---|---|---|
Batter | SW Bates | Suzie Bates | Suzie Bates |
Runs | 47 | 47 | 46 |
Balls | 46 | 46 | 46 |
Minutes | 61 | 61 | |
Fours | 3 | 3 | 3 |
Sixes | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Strike rate | 102.17 | 102.17 | 100.0 |
Bowlers
Bowler position 7
This bowler has an unacceptable difference noted in the economy rate, and runs shown on each scorecard. For economy rate, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 8.33, while ICC shows 8.0; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 this is outside that and thus unacceptable. For runs, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 25, while ICC shows 24.
The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:
Source | CricketArchive | ESPNcricinfo | ICC |
---|---|---|---|
Bowler | N de Klerk | Nadine de Klerk | Nadine de Klerk |
Overs | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Maidens | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Runs | 25 | 25 | 24 |
Wickets | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Wides | 1 | 1 | |
Noballs | 0 | 0 | |
Economy rate | 8.33 | 8.33 | 8.0 |
Dot balls | 4 |
Fall of wickets
Fall of wicket 2
This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. For runs, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 169, while ICC shows 168.
The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:
Source | CricketArchive | ESPNcricinfo | ICC |
---|---|---|---|
Wicket | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Runs | 169 | 169 | 168 |
Ball | 19.5 | 19.5 | 19.5 |
Innings 2
Number of players who did not bat
This innings has an unacceptable difference noted in the did not bat shown on each scorecard. For did not bat, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 0, while ICC shows 1.
Total
This innings has an unacceptable difference noted in the wickets shown on each scorecard. For wickets, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 10, while ICC shows 9.
The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:
Source | CricketArchive | ESPNcricinfo | ICC |
---|---|---|---|
Runs | 102 | 102 | 102 |
Wickets | 10 | 10 | 9 |
Batters
Batting position 1
This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. For strike rate, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 113.64, while ICC shows 113.63; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.
The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:
Source | CricketArchive | ESPNcricinfo | ICC |
---|---|---|---|
Batter | L Lee | Lizelle Lee | Lizelle Lee |
Runs | 25 | 25 | 25 |
Balls | 22 | 22 | 22 |
Minutes | 23 | 23 | |
Fours | 4 | 4 | 4 |
Sixes | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Strike rate | 113.64 | 113.64 | 113.63 |
Method of dismissal | caught | caught | caught |
Batting position 3
This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. For strike rate, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 114.29, while ICC shows 114.28; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.
The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:
Source | CricketArchive | ESPNcricinfo | ICC |
---|---|---|---|
Batter | SE Luus | Sune Luus | Sune Luus |
Runs | 16 | 16 | 16 |
Balls | 14 | 14 | 14 |
Minutes | 20 | 20 | |
Fours | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Sixes | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Strike rate | 114.29 | 114.29 | 114.28 |
Method of dismissal | caught | caught | caught |
Batting position 5
This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. For strike rate, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 116.67, while ICC shows 116.66; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.
The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:
Source | CricketArchive | ESPNcricinfo | ICC |
---|---|---|---|
Batter | M du Preez | Mignon du Preez | Mignon du Preez |
Runs | 14 | 14 | 14 |
Balls | 12 | 12 | 12 |
Minutes | 19 | 19 | |
Fours | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Sixes | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Strike rate | 116.67 | 116.67 | 116.66 |
Method of dismissal | caught | caught | caught |
Bowlers
Bowler position 1
This bowler has an acceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. For economy rate, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 5.67, while ICC shows 5.66; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.
This bowler has an unacceptable difference noted in the wides shown on each scorecard. For wides, ESPNcricinfo shows 1, while CricketArchive shows 2.
The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:
Source | CricketArchive | ESPNcricinfo | ICC |
---|---|---|---|
Bowler | JM Kerr | Jess Kerr | Jess Kerr |
Overs | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Maidens | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Runs | 17 | 17 | 17 |
Wickets | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Wides | 2 | 1 | |
Noballs | 0 | 0 | |
Economy rate | 5.67 | 5.67 | 5.66 |
Dot balls | 7 |
Bowler position 6
This bowler has an acceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. For economy rate, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 6.67, while ICC shows 6.66; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.
The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:
Source | CricketArchive | ESPNcricinfo | ICC |
---|---|---|---|
Bowler | AC Kerr | Amelia Kerr | Amelia Kerr |
Overs | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Maidens | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Runs | 20 | 20 | 20 |
Wickets | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Wides | 0 | 0 | |
Noballs | 0 | 0 | |
Economy rate | 6.67 | 6.67 | 6.66 |
Dot balls | 5 |
The ICC commentary incorrect misses a run by Bates on delivery 15.4 in the 1st innings. This then causes all of the discrepancies seen for the match.