ID
1203678
Match type
T20
Dates
Jan 19
Teams
Ireland, West Indies
Gender
male
Sources
CricketArchive, ESPNcricinfo, ICC
Status
Mismatch
Number of errors
5
Comparison data
JSON

Discrepancies

Innings 1

Number of wickets

This innings has an unacceptable difference noted in the wickets shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the wickets as 10, while ICC lists it as 9.

Total

This innings has an unacceptable difference noted in the wickets shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the wickets as 10, while ICC lists it as 9.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Wickets
CricketArchive 138 10
ESPNcricinfo 138 10
ICC 138 9

Batters

Batting position 3

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 121.73, while CricketArchive lists it as 121.74. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Dot balls Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 28 23 36 3 0 7 121.74 run out
ESPNcricinfo 28 23   3 0   121.73 run out
ICC 28 23   3 0   121.73 run out
Batting position 7

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 66.66, while CricketArchive lists it as 66.67. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Dot balls Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 6 9 13 0 0 4 66.67 run out
ESPNcricinfo 6 9   0 0   66.66 run out
ICC 6 9   0 0   66.66  
Batting position 10

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 72.72, while CricketArchive lists it as 72.73. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Dot balls Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 8 11 12 1 0 6 72.73 caught
ESPNcricinfo 8 11   1 0   72.72 caught
ICC 8 11   1 0   72.72 caught

Fall of wickets

Fall of wicket 7

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the ball shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the ball as 13.1, while ICC lists it as 13.3.

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the runs as 107, while ICC lists it as 108.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Wicket Runs Ball
CricketArchive 7 107 13.1
ESPNcricinfo 7 107 13.1
ICC 7 108 13.3
Fall of wicket 8

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the ball shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the ball as 13.3, while ICC lists it as 16.4.

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the runs as 108, while ICC lists it as 125.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Wicket Runs Ball
CricketArchive 8 108 13.3
ESPNcricinfo 8 108 13.3
ICC 8 125 16.4
Fall of wicket 9

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the ball shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the ball as 16.4, while ICC lists it as 19.1.

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the runs as 125, while ICC lists it as 138.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Wicket Runs Ball
CricketArchive 9 125 16.4
ESPNcricinfo 9 125 16.4
ICC 9 138 19.1

Innings 2

Bowlers

Bowler position 3

This bowler has an acceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the economy rate as 13.66, while CricketArchive lists it as 13.67. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Wides Noballs Dot balls Fours Sixes Economy rate
CricketArchive 3.0 0 41 1 0 0 5 2 4 13.67
ESPNcricinfo 3.0 0 41 1 0 0 5 2 4 13.66
ICC 3.0 0 41 1           13.66