- Match type
- T20
- Teams
- Ireland vs West Indies
- Gender
- male
- Dates
- Jan 19
- Sources
- CricketArchive, ESPNcricinfo, ICC
- Status
- Mismatch
- Number of errors
- 5
The discrepancies in this match have been identified and can be attributed to the following sources:
- ICC
Discrepancies
Innings 1
Number of fallen wickets
This innings has an unacceptable difference noted in the fallen wickets shown on each scorecard. For fallen wickets, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 10, while ICC shows 9.
Total
This innings has an unacceptable difference noted in the wickets shown on each scorecard. For wickets, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 10, while ICC shows 9.
The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:
| Source | CricketArchive | ESPNcricinfo | ICC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Runs | 138 | 138 | 138 |
| Wickets | 10 | 10 | 9 |
Batters
Batting position 3
This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. For strike rate, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 121.74, while ICC shows 121.73; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.
The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:
| Source | CricketArchive | ESPNcricinfo | ICC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Batter | A Balbirnie | Andy Balbirnie | Andrew Balbirnie |
| Runs | 28 | 28 | 28 |
| Balls | 23 | 23 | 23 |
| Minutes | 36 | ||
| Fours | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Sixes | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dot balls | 7 | ||
| Strike rate | 121.74 | 121.74 | 121.73 |
| Method of dismissal | run out | run out | run out |
Batting position 7
This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. For strike rate, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 66.67, while ICC shows 66.66; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.
The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:
| Source | CricketArchive | ESPNcricinfo | ICC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Batter | Adair | Mark Adair | Mark Adair |
| Runs | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Balls | 9 | 9 | 9 |
| Minutes | 13 | ||
| Fours | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sixes | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dot balls | 4 | ||
| Strike rate | 66.67 | 66.67 | 66.66 |
| Method of dismissal | run out | run out |
Batting position 10
This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. For strike rate, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 72.73, while ICC shows 72.72; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.
The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:
| Source | CricketArchive | ESPNcricinfo | ICC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Batter | CA Young | Craig Young | Craig Young |
| Runs | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| Balls | 11 | 11 | 11 |
| Minutes | 12 | ||
| Fours | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Sixes | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dot balls | 6 | ||
| Strike rate | 72.73 | 72.73 | 72.72 |
| Method of dismissal | caught | caught | caught |
Fall of wickets
Fall of wicket 7
This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the ball, and runs shown on each scorecard. For ball, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 13.1, while ICC shows 13.3. For runs, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 107, while ICC shows 108.
The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:
| Source | CricketArchive | ESPNcricinfo | ICC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wicket | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| Runs | 107 | 107 | 108 |
| Ball | 13.1 | 13.1 | 13.3 |
Fall of wicket 8
This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the ball, and runs shown on each scorecard. For ball, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 13.3, while ICC shows 16.4. For runs, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 108, while ICC shows 125.
The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:
| Source | CricketArchive | ESPNcricinfo | ICC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wicket | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| Runs | 108 | 108 | 125 |
| Ball | 13.3 | 13.3 | 16.4 |
Fall of wicket 9
This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the ball, and runs shown on each scorecard. For ball, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 16.4, while ICC shows 19.1. For runs, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 125, while ICC shows 138.
The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:
| Source | CricketArchive | ESPNcricinfo | ICC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wicket | 9 | 9 | 9 |
| Runs | 125 | 125 | 138 |
| Ball | 16.4 | 16.4 | 19.1 |
Innings 2
Bowlers
Bowler position 3
This bowler has an acceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. For economy rate, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 13.67, while ICC shows 13.66; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.
The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:
| Source | CricketArchive | ESPNcricinfo | ICC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bowler | Simranjit Singh | Simi Singh | Simi Singh |
| Overs | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Maidens | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Runs | 41 | 41 | 41 |
| Wickets | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Wides | 0 | 0 | |
| Noballs | 0 | 0 | |
| Dot balls | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fours | 2 | 2 | |
| Sixes | 4 | 4 | |
| Economy rate | 13.67 | 13.67 | 13.66 |
ICC scorecard, and commentary, completely misses the the dismissal of Adair, resulting in all of the discrepancies shown for this match.