ID
1207730
Match type
T20
Dates
Sep 3
Teams
Essex, Middlesex
Gender
male
Sources
CricketArchive, ECB, ESPNcricinfo
Status
Mismatch
Number of errors
2
Comparison data
JSON

Discrepancies

Innings 1

Batters

Batting position 4

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ECB list the strike rate as 66.66, while CricketArchive lists it as 66.67. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 2 3 3 0 0 66.67 caught
ECB 2 3   0 0 66.66 caught
ESPNcricinfo 2 3 3 0 0 66.66 caught
Batting position 7

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ECB list the strike rate as 138.88, while CricketArchive lists it as 138.89. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Strike rate
CricketArchive 25 18 24 1 1 138.89
ECB 25 18   1 1 138.88
ESPNcricinfo 25 18 24 1 1 138.88

Innings 2

Batters

Batting position 6

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ECB list the strike rate as 66.66, while CricketArchive lists it as 66.67. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 10 15 14 0 0 66.67 caught
ECB 10 15   0 0 66.66 caught
ESPNcricinfo 10 15 14 0 0 66.66 caught
Batting position 8

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ECB list the strike rate as 191.66, while CricketArchive lists it as 191.67. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 23 12 15 1 2 191.67 bowled
ECB 23 12   1 2 191.66 bowled
ESPNcricinfo 23 12 15 1 2 191.66 bowled
Batting position 9

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the balls shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the balls as 6, while ECB lists it as 1.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the fours shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the fours as 1, while ECB lists it as 0.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the runs as 5, while ECB lists it as 1.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the strike rate as 83.33, while ECB lists it as 100.0. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 but this is outside that and is thus unacceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Strike rate
CricketArchive 5 6 13 1 0 83.33
ECB 1 1   0 0 100.0
ESPNcricinfo 5 6 13 1 0 83.33
Batting position 10

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the balls shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the balls as 1, while ECB lists it as 6.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the fours shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the fours as 0, while ECB lists it as 1.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the runs as 1, while ECB lists it as 5.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the strike rate as 100.0, while ECB lists it as 83.33. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 but this is outside that and is thus unacceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Strike rate
CricketArchive 1 1 3 0 0 100.0
ECB 5 6   1 0 83.33
ESPNcricinfo 1 1 3 0 0 100.0