- Match type
- T20
- Teams
- Somerset vs Warwickshire
- Gender
- male
- Dates
- Sep 4
- Sources
- CricketArchive, ECB, ESPNcricinfo
- Status
- Mismatch
- Number of errors
- 1
The discrepancies in this match have been identified and can be attributed to the following sources:
- ECB
Discrepancies
Match Info
Result
This entry has an unacceptable difference noted in the result shown on each scorecard. For result, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show Warwickshire won by 4 runs (D/L method), while ECB shows Warwickshire won.
Innings 1
Batters
Batting position 4
This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. For strike rate, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 177.42, while ECB shows 177.41; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.
The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:
Source | CricketArchive | ECB | ESPNcricinfo |
---|---|---|---|
Batter | SR Hain | Sam Hain | Sam Hain |
Runs | 55 | 55 | 55 |
Balls | 31 | 31 | 31 |
Minutes | 43 | 43 | |
Fours | 6 | 6 | 6 |
Sixes | 3 | 3 | 3 |
Strike rate | 177.42 | 177.41 | 177.42 |
Batting position 5
This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. For strike rate, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 116.67, while ECB shows 116.66; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.
The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:
Source | CricketArchive | ECB | ESPNcricinfo |
---|---|---|---|
Batter | WMH Rhodes | Will Rhodes | Will Rhodes |
Runs | 21 | 21 | 21 |
Balls | 18 | 18 | 18 |
Minutes | 26 | 26 | |
Fours | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Sixes | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Strike rate | 116.67 | 116.66 | 116.67 |
Method of dismissal | bowled | bowled | bowled |
Bowlers
Bowler position 3
This bowler has an acceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. For economy rate, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 13.67, while ECB shows 13.66; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.
The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:
Source | CricketArchive | ECB | ESPNcricinfo |
---|---|---|---|
Bowler | Sale | Oliver Sale | Ollie Sale |
Overs | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Maidens | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Runs | 41 | 41 | 41 |
Wickets | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Wides | 0 | 0 | |
Noballs | 0 | 0 | |
Dot balls | 6 | 6 | 6 |
Economy rate | 13.67 | 13.66 | 13.67 |
Fours | 3 | ||
Sixes | 4 |
Innings 2
Batters
Batting position 3
This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. For strike rate, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 192.31, while ECB shows 192.3; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.
The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:
Source | CricketArchive | ECB | ESPNcricinfo |
---|---|---|---|
Batter | JC Hildreth | JC Hildreth | James Hildreth |
Runs | 25 | 25 | 25 |
Balls | 13 | 13 | 13 |
Minutes | 16 | 16 | |
Fours | 4 | 4 | 4 |
Sixes | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Strike rate | 192.31 | 192.3 | 192.31 |
Method of dismissal | run out | run out | run out |
Bowlers
Bowler position 3
This bowler has an acceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. For economy rate, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 9.67, while ECB shows 9.66; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.
The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:
Source | CricketArchive | ECB | ESPNcricinfo |
---|---|---|---|
Bowler | Brookes | Henry Brookes | Henry Brookes |
Overs | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Maidens | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Runs | 29 | 29 | 29 |
Wickets | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Wides | 0 | 0 | |
Noballs | 0 | 0 | |
Dot balls | 9 | 9 | 9 |
Economy rate | 9.67 | 9.66 | 9.67 |
Fours | 3 | ||
Sixes | 2 |
ECB scorecard correctly states that Warwickshire won the match, however it neglects to mention that it was on the Duckwork-Lewis method.