ID
1207751
Match type
T20
Dates
Sep 12
Teams
Hampshire, Middlesex
Gender
male
Sources
CricketArchive, ECB, ESPNcricinfo
Status
Mismatch
Number of errors
10
Comparison data
JSON

Discrepancies

Innings 1

Batters

Batting position 1

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ECB list the strike rate as 117.85, while CricketArchive lists it as 117.86. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 33 28 39 0 2 117.86 caught and bowled
ECB 33 28   0 2 117.85 caught and bowled
ESPNcricinfo 33 28 39 0 2 117.85 caught and bowled
Batting position 3

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ECB list the strike rate as 79.16, while CricketArchive lists it as 79.17. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 19 24 35 1 0 79.17 caught
ECB 19 24   1 0 79.16 caught
ESPNcricinfo 19 24 35 1 0 79.16 caught
Batting position 4

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ECB list the strike rate as 127.77, while CricketArchive lists it as 127.78. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 23 18 20 2 0 127.78 run out
ECB 23 18   2 0 127.77 run out
ESPNcricinfo 23 18 20 2 0 127.77 run out
Batting position 7

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ECB list the strike rate as 66.66, while CricketArchive lists it as 66.67. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 4 6 11 0 0 66.67 caught
ECB 4 6   0 0 66.66 caught
ESPNcricinfo 4 6 11 0 0 66.66 caught

Innings 2

Extras

This innings has an unacceptable difference noted in the total shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the total as 14, while ECB lists it as 9.

This innings has an unacceptable difference noted in the penalty shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the penalty as 5, while ECB doesn't have a value.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Total Legbyes Wides Penalty
CricketArchive 14 5 4 5
ECB 9 5 4  
ESPNcricinfo 14 5 4 5

Total

This innings has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the runs as 123, while ECB lists it as 118.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Wickets
CricketArchive 123 10
ECB 118 10
ESPNcricinfo 123 10

Batters

Batting position 1

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ECB list the strike rate as 104.87, while CricketArchive lists it as 104.88. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 43 41 60 2 1 104.88 caught and bowled
ECB 43 41   2 1 104.87 caught and bowled
ESPNcricinfo 43 41 60 2 1 104.87 caught and bowled
Batting position 2

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the balls shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the balls as 9, while ECB lists it as 8.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the strike rate as 22.22, while ECB lists it as 25.0. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 but this is outside that and is thus unacceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 2 9 13 0 0 22.22 caught
ECB 2 8   0 0 25.0 caught
ESPNcricinfo 2 9 13 0 0 22.22 caught
Batting position 5

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ECB list the strike rate as 109.67, while CricketArchive lists it as 109.68. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 34 31 38 3 0 109.68 caught
ECB 34 31   3 0 109.67 caught
ESPNcricinfo 34 31 38 3 0 109.67 caught
Batting position 6

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ECB list the strike rate as 88.88, while CricketArchive lists it as 88.89. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 8 9 16 0 0 88.89 caught
ECB 8 9   0 0 88.88 caught
ESPNcricinfo 8 9 16 0 0 88.88 caught

Fall of wickets

Fall of wicket 4

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the runs as 83, while ECB lists it as 78.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Wicket Runs Ball
CricketArchive 4 83 12.6
ECB 4 78 12.6
ESPNcricinfo 4 83 12.6
Fall of wicket 5

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the runs as 92, while ECB lists it as 87.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Wicket Runs Ball
CricketArchive 5 92 14.1
ECB 5 87 14.1
ESPNcricinfo 5 92 14.1
Fall of wicket 6

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the runs as 102, while ECB lists it as 97.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Wicket Runs Ball
CricketArchive 6 102 15.3
ECB 6 97 15.3
ESPNcricinfo 6 102 15.3
Fall of wicket 7

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the runs as 113, while ECB lists it as 108.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Wicket Runs Ball
CricketArchive 7 113 17.1
ECB 7 108 17.1
ESPNcricinfo 7 113 17.1
Fall of wicket 8

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the runs as 113, while ECB lists it as 108.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Wicket Runs Ball
CricketArchive 8 113 17.2
ECB 8 108 17.2
ESPNcricinfo 8 113 17.2
Fall of wicket 9

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the runs as 123, while ECB lists it as 118.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Wicket Runs Ball
CricketArchive 9 123 18.4
ECB 9 118 18.4
ESPNcricinfo 9 123 18.4
Fall of wicket 10

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the runs as 123, while ECB lists it as 118.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Wicket Runs Ball
CricketArchive 10 123 18.5
ECB 10 118 18.5
ESPNcricinfo 10 123 18.5