ID
1207778
Match type
T20
Dates
Sep 18
Teams
Leicestershire, Nottinghamshire
Gender
male
Sources
CricketArchive, ECB, ESPNcricinfo
Status
Mismatch
Number of errors
11
Comparison data
JSON

Discrepancies

Innings 1

Batters

Batting position 1

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ECB list the strike rate as 66.66, while CricketArchive lists it as 66.67. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 4 6 2 1 0 66.67 caught and bowled
ECB 4 6   1 0 66.66 caught and bowled
ESPNcricinfo 4 6 2 1 0 66.66 caught and bowled
Batting position 2

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ECB list the strike rate as 84.61, while CricketArchive lists it as 84.62. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 11 13 24 1 0 84.62 bowled
ECB 11 13   1 0 84.61 bowled
ESPNcricinfo 11 13 24 1 0 84.61 bowled
Batting position 4

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ECB list the strike rate as 123.25, while CricketArchive lists it as 123.26. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 53 43 60 5 0 123.26 caught
ECB 53 43   5 0 123.25 caught
ESPNcricinfo 53 43 60 5 0 123.25 caught
Batting position 5

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ECB list the strike rate as 141.66, while CricketArchive lists it as 141.67. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 51 36 46 5 2 141.67 caught
ECB 51 36   5 2 141.66 caught
ESPNcricinfo 51 36 46 5 2 141.66 caught

Bowlers

Bowler position 2

This bowler has an acceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ECB list the economy rate as 7.66, while CricketArchive lists it as 7.67. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Wides Noballs Dot balls Economy rate
CricketArchive 3.0 0 23 1 0 0 7 7.67
ECB 3.0 0 23 1       7.66
ESPNcricinfo 3.0 0 23 1 0 0 7 7.66

Innings 2

Extras

This innings has an unacceptable difference noted in the total shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the total as 19, while ECB lists it as 14.

This innings has an unacceptable difference noted in the penalty shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the penalty as 5, while ECB doesn't have a value.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Total Legbyes Wides Penalty
CricketArchive 19 7 7 5
ECB 14 7 7  
ESPNcricinfo 19 7 7 5

Total

This innings has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the runs as 163, while ECB lists it as 157.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Wickets
CricketArchive 163 6
ECB 157 6
ESPNcricinfo 163 6

Batters

Batting position 1

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the balls shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ECB list the balls as 7, while CricketArchive lists it as 8.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the runs as 6, while ECB lists it as 5.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the strike rate as 85.71, CricketArchive lists it as 75.0, while ECB lists it as 71.42. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 but this is outside that and is thus unacceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 6 8 10 1 0 75.0 bowled
ECB 5 7   1 0 71.42 bowled
ESPNcricinfo 6 7 10 1 0 85.71 bowled
Batting position 2

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the balls shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ECB list the balls as 8, while CricketArchive lists it as 7.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ECB list the strike rate as 150.0, while CricketArchive lists it as 171.43. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 but this is outside that and is thus unacceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 12 7 13 0 1 171.43 caught
ECB 12 8   0 1 150.0 caught
ESPNcricinfo 12 8 13 0 1 150.0 caught
Batting position 3

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ECB list the strike rate as 147.82, while CricketArchive lists it as 147.83. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 34 23 35 3 2 147.83 caught
ECB 34 23   3 2 147.82 caught
ESPNcricinfo 34 23 35 3 2 147.82 caught
Batting position 4

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ECB list the strike rate as 126.41, while CricketArchive lists it as 126.42. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Strike rate
CricketArchive 67 53 69 5 1 126.42
ECB 67 53   5 1 126.41
ESPNcricinfo 67 53 69 5 1 126.41
Batting position 7

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ECB list the strike rate as 91.66, while CricketArchive lists it as 91.67. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 11 12 15 0 0 91.67 bowled
ECB 11 12   0 0 91.66 bowled
ESPNcricinfo 11 12 15 0 0 91.66 bowled

Bowlers

Bowler position 1

This bowler has an unacceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the economy rate as 8.75, while ECB lists it as 8.5. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 but this is outside that and is thus unacceptable.

This bowler has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the runs as 35, while ECB lists it as 34.

This bowler has an unacceptable difference noted in the dot balls shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the dot balls as 9, while CricketArchive lists it as 8.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Wides Noballs Dot balls Economy rate
CricketArchive 4.0 0 35 1 0 0 8 8.75
ECB 4.0 0 34 1       8.5
ESPNcricinfo 4.0 0 35 1 0 0 9 8.75
Bowler position 3

This bowler has an acceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ECB list the economy rate as 9.52, while CricketArchive lists it as 9.53. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Wides Noballs Dot balls Economy rate
CricketArchive 2.5 0 27 0 1 0 4 9.53
ECB 2.5 0 27 0       9.52
ESPNcricinfo 2.5 0 27 0 1 0 4 9.52

Fall of wickets

Fall of wicket 1

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the runs as 12, while ECB lists it as 6.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Wicket Runs Ball
CricketArchive 1 12 1.4
ECB 1 6 1.4
ESPNcricinfo 1 12 1.4
Fall of wicket 2

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the runs as 26, while ECB lists it as 20.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Wicket Runs Ball
CricketArchive 2 26 2.6
ECB 2 20 2.6
ESPNcricinfo 2 26 2.6
Fall of wicket 3

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the runs as 101, while ECB lists it as 95.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Wicket Runs Ball
CricketArchive 3 101 10.4
ECB 3 95 10.4
ESPNcricinfo 3 101 10.4
Fall of wicket 4

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the runs as 103, while ECB lists it as 97.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Wicket Runs Ball
CricketArchive 4 103 11.3
ECB 4 97 11.3
ESPNcricinfo 4 103 11.3
Fall of wicket 5

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the runs as 113, while ECB lists it as 107.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Wicket Runs Ball
CricketArchive 5 113 13.4
ECB 5 107 13.4
ESPNcricinfo 5 113 13.4
Fall of wicket 6

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the runs as 139, while ECB lists it as 133.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Wicket Runs Ball
CricketArchive 6 139 16.6
ECB 6 133 16.6
ESPNcricinfo 6 139 16.6