- Match type
- T20
- Teams
- Leicestershire vs Nottinghamshire
- Gender
- male
- Dates
- Oct 1
- Sources
- CricketArchive, ECB, ESPNcricinfo
- Status
- Mismatch
- Number of errors
- 1
The discrepancies in this match have been identified and can be attributed to the following sources:
- ESPNcricinfo
- ECB
Discrepancies
Match Info
Result
This entry has an unacceptable difference noted in the result shown on each scorecard. For result, ESPNcricinfo shows Match tied, CricketArchive shows Nottinghamshire won on faster scoring rate, while ECB shows Nottinghamshire won by 3 wickets.
Innings 1
Batters
Batting position 3
This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. For strike rate, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 14.29, while ECB shows 14.28; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.
The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:
Source | CricketArchive | ECB | ESPNcricinfo |
---|---|---|---|
Batter | AM Lilley | Arron Lilley | Arron Lilley |
Runs | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Balls | 7 | 7 | 7 |
Minutes | 5 | 5 | |
Fours | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Sixes | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Strike rate | 14.29 | 14.28 | 14.29 |
Method of dismissal | caught | caught | caught |
Batting position 6
This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. For strike rate, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 141.67, while ECB shows 141.66; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.
The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:
Source | CricketArchive | ECB | ESPNcricinfo |
---|---|---|---|
Batter | LJ Hill | Lewis Hill | Lewis Hill |
Runs | 17 | 17 | 17 |
Balls | 12 | 12 | 12 |
Minutes | 17 | 17 | |
Fours | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Sixes | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Strike rate | 141.67 | 141.66 | 141.67 |
Method of dismissal | lbw | lbw | lbw |
Bowlers
Bowler position 5
This bowler has an acceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. For economy rate, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 5.67, while ECB shows 5.66; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.
The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:
Source | CricketArchive | ECB | ESPNcricinfo |
---|---|---|---|
Bowler | Mullaney | Steven Mullaney | Steven Mullaney |
Overs | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Maidens | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Runs | 17 | 17 | 17 |
Wickets | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Wides | 0 | 0 | |
Noballs | 0 | 0 | |
Dot balls | 7 | 7 | 7 |
Economy rate | 5.67 | 5.66 | 5.67 |
Fours | 0 | ||
Sixes | 1 |
Innings 2
Batters
Batting position 5
This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. For strike rate, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 123.81, while ECB shows 123.8; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.
The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:
Source | CricketArchive | ECB | ESPNcricinfo |
---|---|---|---|
Batter | TJ Moores | Tom Moores | Tom Moores |
Runs | 26 | 26 | 26 |
Balls | 21 | 21 | 21 |
Minutes | 32 | 32 | |
Fours | 4 | 4 | 4 |
Sixes | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Strike rate | 123.81 | 123.8 | 123.81 |
Method of dismissal | bowled | bowled | bowled |
Batting position 7
This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. For strike rate, ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive show 77.78, while ECB shows 77.77; and as we have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.
The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:
Source | CricketArchive | ECB | ESPNcricinfo |
---|---|---|---|
Batter | Mullaney | Steven Mullaney | Steven Mullaney |
Runs | 7 | 7 | 7 |
Balls | 9 | 9 | 9 |
Minutes | 18 | 18 | |
Fours | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Sixes | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Strike rate | 77.78 | 77.77 | 77.78 |
Method of dismissal | caught | caught | caught |
This match was actually won by Nottinghamshire based on a faster scoring rate in the powerplay, after the teams tied after their innings. Cricinfo shows the result as a tie, not taking the tie-breaker into account, whereas the ECB scorecard appears to atempt to determine the result from the scorecard (and gets it badly wrong).