- ID
- 1211652
- Match type
- T20
- Dates
- Feb 28
- Teams
- Lahore Qalandars, Peshawar Zalmi
- Gender
- male
- Sources
- Cricingif, CricketArchive, ESPNcricinfo
- Status
- Mismatch
- Number of errors
- 3
- Comparison data
- JSON

## Discrepancies

### Innings 1

#### Batters

##### Batting position 1

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the *balls* shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the balls as 15, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive list it as 9.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the *fours* shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the fours as 4, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive list it as 2.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the *runs* shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the runs as 34, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive list it as 14.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the *sixes* shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the sixes as 2, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive list it as 0.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the *strike rate* shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the strike rate as 226.66, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive list it as 155.56. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as *0.01* but this is outside that and is thus unacceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source | Runs | Balls | Fours | Sixes | Strike rate | Method of dismissal | Dot balls |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

Cricingif | 14 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 155.56 | caught | |

CricketArchive | 14 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 155.56 | caught | 3 |

ESPNcricinfo | 34 | 15 | 4 | 2 | 226.66 | caught |

##### Batting position 2

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the *balls* shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the balls as 9, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive list it as 15.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the *fours* shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the fours as 2, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive list it as 4.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the *runs* shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the runs as 14, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive list it as 34.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the *sixes* shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the sixes as 0, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive list it as 2.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the *strike rate* shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the strike rate as 155.55, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive list it as 226.67. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as *0.01* but this is outside that and is thus unacceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source | Runs | Balls | Fours | Sixes | Strike rate | Method of dismissal | Dot balls |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

Cricingif | 34 | 15 | 4 | 2 | 226.67 | caught | |

CricketArchive | 34 | 15 | 4 | 2 | 226.67 | caught | 5 |

ESPNcricinfo | 14 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 155.55 | caught |

### Innings 2

#### Batters

##### Batting position 1

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the *strike rate* shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the strike rate as 115.78, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive list it as 115.79. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as *0.01* so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source | Runs | Balls | Fours | Sixes | Strike rate | Method of dismissal | Dot balls |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

Cricingif | 22 | 19 | 1 | 1 | 115.79 | caught | |

CricketArchive | 22 | 19 | 1 | 1 | 115.79 | caught | 7 |

ESPNcricinfo | 22 | 19 | 1 | 1 | 115.78 | caught |

##### Batting position 5

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the *strike rate* shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the strike rate as 226.66, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive list it as 226.67. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as *0.01* so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source | Runs | Balls | Fours | Sixes | Strike rate | Dot balls |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

Cricingif | 34 | 15 | 5 | 1 | 226.67 | |

CricketArchive | 34 | 15 | 5 | 1 | 226.67 | 1 |

ESPNcricinfo | 34 | 15 | 5 | 1 | 226.66 |

#### Fall of wickets

##### Fall of wicket 6

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the *runs* shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the runs as 89, while Cricingif lists it as 93.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source | Runs | Wicket | Ball |
---|---|---|---|

Cricingif | 93 | 6 | 9.5 |

CricketArchive | 89 | 6 | 9.5 |

ESPNcricinfo | 89 | 6 | 9.5 |