ID
1211652
Match type
T20
Dates
Feb 28
Teams
Lahore Qalandars, Peshawar Zalmi
Gender
male
Sources
Cricingif, CricketArchive, ESPNcricinfo
Status
Mismatch
Number of errors
3
Comparison data
JSON

Discrepancies

Innings 1

Batters

Batting position 1

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the balls shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the balls as 15, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive list it as 9.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the fours shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the fours as 4, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive list it as 2.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the runs as 34, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive list it as 14.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the sixes shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the sixes as 2, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive list it as 0.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the strike rate as 226.66, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive list it as 155.56. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 but this is outside that and is thus unacceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal Dot balls
Cricingif 14 9 2 0 155.56 caught  
CricketArchive 14 9 2 0 155.56 caught 3
ESPNcricinfo 34 15 4 2 226.66 caught  
Batting position 2

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the balls shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the balls as 9, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive list it as 15.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the fours shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the fours as 2, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive list it as 4.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the runs as 14, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive list it as 34.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the sixes shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the sixes as 0, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive list it as 2.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the strike rate as 155.55, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive list it as 226.67. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 but this is outside that and is thus unacceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal Dot balls
Cricingif 34 15 4 2 226.67 caught  
CricketArchive 34 15 4 2 226.67 caught 5
ESPNcricinfo 14 9 2 0 155.55 caught  

Innings 2

Batters

Batting position 1

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the strike rate as 115.78, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive list it as 115.79. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal Dot balls
Cricingif 22 19 1 1 115.79 caught  
CricketArchive 22 19 1 1 115.79 caught 7
ESPNcricinfo 22 19 1 1 115.78 caught  
Batting position 5

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the strike rate as 226.66, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive list it as 226.67. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Fours Sixes Strike rate Dot balls
Cricingif 34 15 5 1 226.67  
CricketArchive 34 15 5 1 226.67 1
ESPNcricinfo 34 15 5 1 226.66  

Fall of wickets

Fall of wicket 6

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the runs as 89, while Cricingif lists it as 93.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Wicket Ball
Cricingif 93 6 9.5
CricketArchive 89 6 9.5
ESPNcricinfo 89 6 9.5