ID
1211655
Match type
T20
Dates
Mar 1
Teams
Islamabad United, Karachi Kings
Gender
male
Sources
Cricingif, CricketArchive, ESPNcricinfo
Status
Mismatch
Number of errors
5
Comparison data
JSON

Discrepancies

Innings 1

Extras

This innings has an unacceptable difference noted in the total shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and Cricingif list the total as 5, while CricketArchive lists it as 3.

This innings has an unacceptable difference noted in the legbyes shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and Cricingif list the legbyes as 2, while CricketArchive doesn't have a value.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Total Legbyes Wides
Cricingif 5 2 3
CricketArchive 3   3
ESPNcricinfo 5 2 3

Batters

Batting position 1

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and Cricingif list the runs as 85, while CricketArchive lists it as 87.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and Cricingif list the strike rate as 146.55, while CricketArchive lists it as 150.0. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 but this is outside that and is thus unacceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Fours Sixes Strike rate Dot balls
Cricingif 85 58 9 2 146.55  
CricketArchive 87 58 9 2 150.0 16
ESPNcricinfo 85 58 9 2 146.55  

Bowlers

Bowler position 3

This bowler has an unacceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and Cricingif list the economy rate as 11.25, while CricketArchive lists it as 11.75. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 but this is outside that and is thus unacceptable.

This bowler has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and Cricingif list the runs as 45, while CricketArchive lists it as 47.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Economy rate Wides Noballs Dot balls Fours Sixes
Cricingif 4.0 0 45 0 11.25          
CricketArchive 4.0 0 47 0 11.75 2 0 5 1 4
ESPNcricinfo 4.0 0 45 0 11.25 2 0      

Innings 2

Bowlers

Bowler position 1

This bowler has an unacceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and Cricingif list the economy rate as 9.25, while CricketArchive lists it as 13.5. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 but this is outside that and is thus unacceptable.

This bowler has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and Cricingif list the runs as 37, while CricketArchive lists it as 54.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Economy rate Wides Noballs Dot balls Fours Sixes
Cricingif 4.0 1 37 1 9.25          
CricketArchive 4.0 1 54 1 13.5 2 0 13 4 4
ESPNcricinfo 4.0 1 37 1 9.25 2 0      
Bowler position 3

This bowler has an acceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the economy rate as 10.66, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive list it as 10.67. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Economy rate Wides Noballs Dot balls Fours Sixes
Cricingif 3.0 0 32 0 10.67          
CricketArchive 3.0 0 32 0 10.67 0 0 5 3 2
ESPNcricinfo 3.0 0 32 0 10.66 0 0      
Bowler position 4

This bowler has an unacceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the economy rate as 17.62, Cricingif lists it as 17.63, while CricketArchive lists it as 11.25. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 but this is outside that and is thus unacceptable.

This bowler has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and Cricingif list the runs as 47, while CricketArchive lists it as 30.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Economy rate Wides Noballs Dot balls Fours Sixes
Cricingif 2.4 0 47 0 17.63          
CricketArchive 2.4 0 30 0 11.25 0 0 2 1 3
ESPNcricinfo 2.4 0 47 0 17.62 0 0