ID
1211662
Match type
T20
Dates
Mar 7
Teams
Lahore Qalandars, Quetta Gladiators
Gender
male
Sources
Cricingif, CricketArchive, ESPNcricinfo
Status
Mismatch
Number of errors
1
Comparison data
JSON

Discrepancies

Innings 1

Batters

Batting position 8

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the strike rate as 91.42, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive list it as 91.43. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal Dot balls
Cricingif 32 35 2 2 91.43 bowled  
CricketArchive 32 35 2 2 91.43 bowled 20
ESPNcricinfo 32 35 2 2 91.42 bowled  

Fall of wickets

Fall of wicket 8

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the ball shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the ball as 15.2, while Cricingif lists it as 0.0.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Wicket Ball
Cricingif 59 8 0.0
CricketArchive 59 8 15.2
ESPNcricinfo 59 8 15.2

Innings 2

Batters

Batting position 1

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the strike rate as 153.84, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive list it as 153.85. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal Dot balls
Cricingif 20 13 3 1 153.85 bowled  
CricketArchive 20 13 3 1 153.85 bowled 7
ESPNcricinfo 20 13 3 1 153.84 bowled  
Batting position 3

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the strike rate as 121.87, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive list it as 121.88. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Fours Sixes Strike rate Dot balls
Cricingif 39 32 4 1 121.88  
CricketArchive 39 32 4 1 121.88 14
ESPNcricinfo 39 32 4 1 121.87  
Batting position 4

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the strike rate as 142.85, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive list it as 142.86. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Fours Sixes Strike rate Dot balls
Cricingif 30 21 3 1 142.86  
CricketArchive 30 21 3 1 142.86 7
ESPNcricinfo 30 21 3 1 142.85  

Bowlers

Bowler position 4

This bowler has an acceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the economy rate as 9.17, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive list it as 9.18. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Economy rate Wides Noballs Dot balls Fours Sixes
Cricingif 2.5 0 26 0 9.18          
CricketArchive 2.5 0 26 0 9.18 0 0 6 3 1
ESPNcricinfo 2.5 0 26 0 9.17 0 0 6 3 1