ID
1211668
Match type
T20
Dates
Mar 13
Teams
Multan Sultans, Peshawar Zalmi
Gender
male
Sources
Cricingif, CricketArchive, ESPNcricinfo
Status
Mismatch
Number of errors
2
Comparison data
JSON

Discrepancies

Innings 1

Batters

Batting position 3

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the strike rate as 121.73, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive list it as 121.74. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal Dot balls
Cricingif 28 23 3 0 121.74 caught  
CricketArchive 28 23 3 0 121.74 caught 5
ESPNcricinfo 28 23 3 0 121.73 caught  

Innings 2

Number of wickets

This innings has an unacceptable difference noted in the wickets shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the wickets as 8, while Cricingif lists it as 7.

Total

This innings has an unacceptable difference noted in the wickets shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the wickets as 8, while Cricingif lists it as 7.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Wickets
Cricingif 151 7
CricketArchive 151 8
ESPNcricinfo 151 8

Batters

Batting position 2

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the strike rate as 136.58, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive list it as 136.59. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal Dot balls
Cricingif 56 41 4 2 136.59 caught  
CricketArchive 56 41 4 2 136.59 caught 11
ESPNcricinfo 56 41 4 2 136.58 caught  
Batting position 3

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the strike rate as 42.85, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive list it as 42.86. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal Dot balls
Cricingif 3 7 0 0 42.86 caught  
CricketArchive 3 7 0 0 42.86 caught 5
ESPNcricinfo 3 7 0 0 42.85 caught  
Batting position 4

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the strike rate as 126.08, while Cricingif, and CricketArchive list it as 126.09. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Fours Sixes Strike rate Method of dismissal Dot balls
Cricingif 29 23 4 0 126.09 bowled  
CricketArchive 29 23 4 0 126.09 bowled 8
ESPNcricinfo 29 23 4 0 126.08 bowled