ID
1213058
Match type
T20
Dates
Jan 24
Teams
Bangladesh, Pakistan
Gender
male
Sources
CricketArchive, ESPNcricinfo, ICC
Status
Mismatch
Number of errors
5
Comparison data
JSON

Discrepancies

Innings 1

Batters

Batting position 1

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 114.7, while CricketArchive lists it as 114.71. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Dot balls Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 39 34 49 4 1 13 114.71 run out
ESPNcricinfo 39 34   4 1   114.7 run out
ICC 39 34   4 1   114.7 run out
Batting position 2

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 104.87, while CricketArchive lists it as 104.88. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Dot balls Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 43 41 65 3 2 19 104.88 caught
ESPNcricinfo 43 41   3 2   104.87 caught
ICC 43 41   3 2   104.87 caught
Batting position 3

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 92.3, while CricketArchive lists it as 92.31. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Dot balls Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 12 13 16 2 0 7 92.31 run out
ESPNcricinfo 12 13   2 0   92.3 run out
ICC 12 13   2 0   92.3 run out
Batting position 7

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 166.66, while CricketArchive lists it as 166.67. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Dot balls Strike rate
CricketArchive 5 3 6 1 0 1 166.67
ESPNcricinfo 5 3   1 0   166.66
ICC 5 3   1 0   166.66

Innings 2

Number of wickets

This innings has an unacceptable difference noted in the wickets shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the wickets as 5, while ICC lists it as 4.

Total

This innings has an unacceptable difference noted in the wickets shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the wickets as 5, while ICC lists it as 4.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Wickets
CricketArchive 142 5
ESPNcricinfo 142 5
ICC 142 4

Batters

Batting position 4

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 128.88, while CricketArchive lists it as 128.89. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Dot balls Strike rate
CricketArchive 58 45 75 5 0 7 128.89
ESPNcricinfo 58 45   5 0   128.88
ICC 58 45   5 0   128.88
Batting position 5

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 123.07, while CricketArchive lists it as 123.08. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Dot balls Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 16 13 25 2 0 4 123.08 caught
ESPNcricinfo 16 13   2 0   123.07 caught
ICC 16 13   2 0   123.07 caught

Bowlers

Bowler position 5

This bowler has an unacceptable difference noted in the wickets shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the wickets as 1, while ICC lists it as 0.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Wides Noballs Dot balls Fours Sixes Economy rate
CricketArchive 4.0 0 28 1 0 0 2 2 0 7.0
ESPNcricinfo 4.0 0 28 1 0 0 2 2 0 7.0
ICC 4.0 0 28 0           7.0

Fall of wickets

Fall of wicket 3

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the ball shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the ball as 11.5, while ICC lists it as 16.3.

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the runs as 81, while ICC lists it as 117.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Wicket Runs Ball
CricketArchive 3 81 11.5
ESPNcricinfo 3 81 11.5
ICC 3 117 16.3
Fall of wicket 4

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the ball shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the ball as 16.3, while ICC lists it as 18.1.

This fall of wicket has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the runs as 117, while ICC lists it as 133.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Wicket Runs Ball
CricketArchive 4 117 16.3
ESPNcricinfo 4 117 16.3
ICC 4 133 18.1