ID
1214668
Match type
ODI
Dates
Mar 3
Teams
Bangladesh, Zimbabwe
Gender
male
Sources
CricketArchive, ESPNcricinfo, ICC
Status
Mismatch
Number of errors
1
Comparison data
JSON

Discrepancies

Innings 1

Batters

Batting position 1

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 116.17, while CricketArchive lists it as 116.18. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Dot balls Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 158 136 187 20 3 57 116.18 caught
ESPNcricinfo 158 136   20 3   116.17 caught
ICC 158 136   20 3   116.17 caught
Batting position 2

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 64.28, while CricketArchive lists it as 64.29. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Dot balls Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 9 14 31 2 0 11 64.29 run out
ESPNcricinfo 9 14   2 0   64.28 run out
ICC 9 14   2 0   64.28 run out
Batting position 5

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 71.92, while CricketArchive lists it as 71.93. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Dot balls Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 41 57 68 3 0 27 71.93 caught
ESPNcricinfo 41 57   3 0   71.92 caught
ICC 41 57   3 0   71.92 caught
Batting position 6

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 177.77, while CricketArchive lists it as 177.78. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Dot balls Strike rate
CricketArchive 32 18 43 3 1 0 177.78
ESPNcricinfo 32 18   3 1   177.77
ICC 32 18   3 1   177.77

Bowlers

Bowler position 3

This bowler has an acceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the economy rate as 6.87, while CricketArchive lists it as 6.88. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Wides Noballs Dot balls Fours Sixes Economy rate
CricketArchive 8.0 0 55 2 1 0 17 7 0 6.88
ESPNcricinfo 8.0 0 55 2 1 0 17 7 0 6.87
ICC 8.0 0 55 2           6.87
Bowler position 4

This bowler has an acceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the economy rate as 5.42, while CricketArchive lists it as 5.43. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Wides Noballs Dot balls Fours Sixes Economy rate
CricketArchive 7.0 0 38 1 0 0 15 3 0 5.43
ESPNcricinfo 7.0 0 38 1 0 0 15 3 0 5.42
ICC 7.0 0 38 1           5.42

Innings 2

Batters

Batting position 1

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 72.85, while CricketArchive lists it as 72.86. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Dot balls Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 51 70 93 5 2 45 72.86 bowled
ESPNcricinfo 51 70   5 2   72.85 bowled
ICC 51 70   5 2   72.85 bowled
Batting position 5

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 91.22, while CricketArchive lists it as 91.23. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Dot balls Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 52 57 76 5 0 23 91.23 lbw
ESPNcricinfo 52 57   5 0   91.22 lbw
ICC 52 57   5 0   91.22 lbw
Batting position 6

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 115.78, while CricketArchive lists it as 115.79. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Dot balls Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 66 57 75 5 2 19 115.79 caught
ESPNcricinfo 66 57   5 2   115.78 caught
ICC 66 57   5 2   115.78 caught
Batting position 9

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 196.42, while CricketArchive lists it as 196.43. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Dot balls Strike rate
CricketArchive 55 28 43 2 5 6 196.43
ESPNcricinfo 55 28   2 5   196.42
ICC 55 28   2 5   196.42

Bowlers

Bowler position 4

This bowler has an unacceptable difference noted in the economy rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the economy rate as 8.5, while ICC lists it as 8.25. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the economy rate field as 0.01 but this is outside that and is thus unacceptable.

This bowler has an unacceptable difference noted in the overs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the overs as 10.0, while ICC lists it as 8.0.

This bowler has an unacceptable difference noted in the runs shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and CricketArchive list the runs as 85, while ICC lists it as 66.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Wides Noballs Dot balls Fours Sixes Economy rate
CricketArchive 10.0 0 85 1 3 0 26 8 4 8.5
ESPNcricinfo 10.0 0 85 1 3 0 26 8 4 8.5
ICC 8.0 0 66 1           8.25