ID
1216418
Match type
T20
Dates
Mar 10
Teams
Afghanistan, Ireland
Gender
male
Sources
CricketArchive, ESPNcricinfo, ICC
Status
Mismatch
Number of errors
1
Comparison data
JSON

Discrepancies

Innings 1

Batters

Batting position 2

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 123.8, while CricketArchive lists it as 123.81. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Dot balls Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 26 21 41 4 0 7 123.81 caught
ESPNcricinfo 26 21   4 0   123.8 caught
ICC 26 21   4 0   123.8 caught
Batting position 4

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 127.58, while CricketArchive lists it as 127.59. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Dot balls Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 37 29 36 5 1 13 127.59 caught
ESPNcricinfo 37 29   5 1   127.58 caught
ICC 37 29   5 1   127.58 caught
Batting position 5

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 140.9, while CricketArchive lists it as 140.91. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Dot balls Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 31 22 31 1 2 4 140.91 caught
ESPNcricinfo 31 22   1 2   140.9 caught
ICC 31 22   1 2   140.9 caught

Innings 2

Batters

Batting position 1

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 144.82, while CricketArchive lists it as 144.83. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Dot balls Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 42 29 33 3 3 12 144.83 caught
ESPNcricinfo 42 29   3 3   144.82 caught
ICC 42 29   3 3   144.82 caught
Batting position 3

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 154.54, while CricketArchive lists it as 154.55. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Dot balls Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 17 11 20 1 1 3 154.55 bowled
ESPNcricinfo 17 11   1 1   154.54 bowled
ICC 17 11   1 1   154.54 bowled
Batting position 4

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 106.66, while CricketArchive lists it as 106.67. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Dot balls Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 32 30 57 2 1 10 106.67 caught
ESPNcricinfo 32 30   2 1   106.66 caught
ICC 32 30   2 1   106.66 caught
Batting position 7

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the strike rate shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo, and ICC list the strike rate as 90.9, while CricketArchive lists it as 90.91. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as 0.01 so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Runs Balls Minutes Fours Sixes Dot balls Strike rate Method of dismissal
CricketArchive 10 11 22 1 0 4 90.91 bowled
ESPNcricinfo 10 11   1 0   90.9 bowled
ICC 10 11   1 0   90.9 bowled

Bowlers

Bowler position 2

This bowler has an unacceptable difference noted in the fours shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the fours as 3, while CricketArchive lists it as 2.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source Overs Maidens Runs Wickets Wides Noballs Dot balls Fours Sixes Economy rate
CricketArchive 4.0 0 21 1 0 0 9 2 0 5.25
ESPNcricinfo 4.0 0 21 1 0 0 9 3 0 5.25
ICC 4.0 0 21 1           5.25