- ID
- 1227866
- Match type
- T20
- Dates
- Aug 18
- Teams
- Barbados Tridents, St Kitts and Nevis Patriots
- Gender
- male
- Sources
- CricketArchive, ESPNcricinfo
- Status
- Mismatch
- Number of errors
- 2
- Comparison data
- JSON

## Discrepancies

### Innings 1

#### Batters

##### Batting position 1

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the *strike rate* shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the strike rate as 66.66, while CricketArchive lists it as 66.67. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as *0.01* so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source | Runs | Balls | Fours | Sixes | Dot balls | Strike rate | Method of dismissal |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

CricketArchive | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 66.67 | bowled |

ESPNcricinfo | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 66.66 | bowled |

##### Batting position 2

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the *strike rate* shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the strike rate as 42.85, while CricketArchive lists it as 42.86. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as *0.01* so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source | Runs | Balls | Fours | Sixes | Dot balls | Strike rate | Method of dismissal |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

CricketArchive | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 42.86 | caught |

ESPNcricinfo | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 42.85 | caught |

##### Batting position 5

This batter has an acceptable difference noted in the *strike rate* shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the strike rate as 172.72, while CricketArchive lists it as 172.73. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as *0.01* so this is regarded as a "leeway match", and thus acceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source | Runs | Balls | Fours | Sixes | Dot balls | Strike rate | Method of dismissal |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

CricketArchive | 38 | 22 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 172.73 | caught |

ESPNcricinfo | 38 | 22 | 2 | 3 | 172.72 | caught |

### Innings 2

#### Batters

##### Batting position 1

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the *balls* shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the balls as 18, while CricketArchive lists it as 17.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the *fours* shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the fours as 2, while CricketArchive lists it as 3.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the *method of dismissal* shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the method of dismissal as run out, while CricketArchive lists it as caught.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the *runs* shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the runs as 12, while CricketArchive lists it as 19.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the *strike rate* shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the strike rate as 66.66, while CricketArchive lists it as 111.76. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as *0.01* but this is outside that and is thus unacceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source | Runs | Balls | Fours | Sixes | Dot balls | Strike rate | Method of dismissal |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

CricketArchive | 19 | 17 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 111.76 | caught |

ESPNcricinfo | 12 | 18 | 2 | 0 | 66.66 | run out |

##### Batting position 2

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the *balls* shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the balls as 17, while CricketArchive lists it as 18.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the *fours* shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the fours as 3, while CricketArchive lists it as 2.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the *method of dismissal* shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the method of dismissal as caught, while CricketArchive lists it as run out.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the *runs* shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the runs as 19, while CricketArchive lists it as 12.

This batter has an unacceptable difference noted in the *strike rate* shown on each scorecard. ESPNcricinfo lists the strike rate as 111.76, while CricketArchive lists it as 66.67. We have defined an acceptable leeway for the strike rate field as *0.01* but this is outside that and is thus unacceptable.

The full details for the compared entry on the various sources are:

Source | Runs | Balls | Fours | Sixes | Dot balls | Strike rate | Method of dismissal |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

CricketArchive | 12 | 18 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 66.67 | run out |

ESPNcricinfo | 19 | 17 | 3 | 0 | 111.76 | caught |